2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/958254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependent Functional Data

Abstract: This paper reviews recent research on dependent functional data. After providing an introduction to functional data analysis, we focus on two types of dependent functional data structures: time series of curves and spatially distributed curves. We review statistical models, inferential methodology, and possible extensions. The paper is intended to provide a concise introduction to the subject with plentiful references.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…, n, defining the system of stochastic differential or pseudodifferential equations (9). Covariance operator estimation has been addressed in [8], [38] and [43].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n, defining the system of stochastic differential or pseudodifferential equations (9). Covariance operator estimation has been addressed in [8], [38] and [43].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many functional data sets, most notably in finance and environmental sciences, arise from long records of observations. This gives additional support to treat these data as a time series of evolving shape curves, which we will call a Functional Time Series (Bosq (1991), Bosq (2000), Kokoszka (2012)). Following Bosq (1991), the main idea behind functional time series modeling is that in many situations the time record can be split into natural intervals, and instead of modeling periodicity, we treat the curve in each interval as a whole observational unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cf., e.g.,Kokoszka (2012),Aue & Horváth (2013) and the invited discussion paper by.2 Cf., also andBerkes et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%