Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p16-1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency Parsing with Bounded Block Degree and Well-nestedness via Lagrangian Relaxation and Branch-and-Bound

Abstract: We present a novel dependency parsing method which enforces two structural properties on dependency trees: bounded block degree and well-nestedness. These properties are useful to better represent the set of admissible dependency structures in treebanks and connect dependency parsing to context-sensitive grammatical formalisms. We cast this problem as an Integer Linear Program that we solve with Lagrangian Relaxation from which we derive a heuristic and an exact method based on a Branch-and-Bound search. Exper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a verbal phrase is not constrained to contain a verb. As such, they can be assimilated to the mainstream approach to bi-lexical dependency parsing where one considers candidate outputs only in a restricted class of graphs: non-projective (McDonald et al, 2005), projective (Eisner, 1997) or bounded block degree and wellnested spanning aborescences (Gómez-Rodríguez et al, 2009Corro et al, 2016), among others (Kuhlmann and Nivre, 2006;Satta and Kuhlmann, 2013;Pitler et al, 2012). These approaches assume that intricate relations in the syntactic content can be implicitly learned by the scoring function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a verbal phrase is not constrained to contain a verb. As such, they can be assimilated to the mainstream approach to bi-lexical dependency parsing where one considers candidate outputs only in a restricted class of graphs: non-projective (McDonald et al, 2005), projective (Eisner, 1997) or bounded block degree and wellnested spanning aborescences (Gómez-Rodríguez et al, 2009Corro et al, 2016), among others (Kuhlmann and Nivre, 2006;Satta and Kuhlmann, 2013;Pitler et al, 2012). These approaches assume that intricate relations in the syntactic content can be implicitly learned by the scoring function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we restricted our grammar to spinal trees but it could be possible to allow full lexicalized TAG-like trees, with substitution nodes and even obligatory adjunction sites. Derivations compat-ible with the TAG formalism (or more generally LCFRS) could be recovered by the use of a constrained version of MSA (Corro et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact pruning based on duality has already been studied in parsing, with branch and bound (Corro et al, 2016) or column generation (Riedel et al, 2012) and in machine translation with beam search (Rush et al, 2013).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations