1990
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.1.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency on soup kitchens in urban areas of New York State.

Abstract: We studied the dependency of persons on soup kitchens in Albany, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Westchester County, New York. Seventeen percent of the meal recipients were homeless, 62 percent lived in apartments or houses, 20 percent were working, 40 percent were women, and 17 percent had a child in their household. Fifty-nine percent started eating at the soup kitchen more than a year ago, and 51 percent ate five or more meals at soup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this survey, 43% of those interviewed were newly housed or in flats/bedsits and financially vulnerable. The experience in this survey echoes that of the USA, where about 60% interviewed in 20–30 sites in different studies were in flat/bedsit accommodation, many of whom lacked basic facilities, such as a cooker or refrigerator (Rauschenbach et al ., 1990; Bowering et al ., 1991). It is often said that day centres and soup runs perpetuate the problems of homelessness, and encourage a negative support system for vulnerable groups, further marginalizing them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In this survey, 43% of those interviewed were newly housed or in flats/bedsits and financially vulnerable. The experience in this survey echoes that of the USA, where about 60% interviewed in 20–30 sites in different studies were in flat/bedsit accommodation, many of whom lacked basic facilities, such as a cooker or refrigerator (Rauschenbach et al ., 1990; Bowering et al ., 1991). It is often said that day centres and soup runs perpetuate the problems of homelessness, and encourage a negative support system for vulnerable groups, further marginalizing them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The existing studies on the characteristics and dietary quality of CFA clients utilize data from surveying clients at food pantries without a comparison group of observationally similar nonclients. [12][13][14][15][16] Moreover, these studies focus on foods obtained by CFA clients through CFAs, and limited information is available for foods acquired through other venues such as superstores, supermarkets, and convenience stores. Thus, it is difficult to compare the importance of different shopping locations for CFA users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bowering et al . (1991) and Rauschenbach et al (1990) studied soup kitchen users in New York City. Eighty per cent of the sample population used this service for less than one year, while nearly one-fifth were long-term users.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%