2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency of microhardness on solidification processing parameters and microstructure characteristics in the directionally solidified Ti–46Al–0.5W–0.5Si alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
5
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(44 reference statements)
3
20
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average microhardness values measured on the longitudinal and transverse sections of the samples are given in Table 1 52 , Liu et al 53 , Frear et al 54 and Ghosh 55 , respectively. The exponent value (0.13-0.14) of the V (for lamellar structure) is in good agreement with the value of 0.14, 0.11, 0.15, values obtained by Zhang et al 7 for Ni-25at.%Si alloy, by Hu et al 56 for Sn-1.0 wt.% Cu, by Fan et al 57 for Ti-46Al-0.5W-0.5Si alloy (at.%), respectively. Decrease in lamellar spacing due to the increasing solidification rate, increased the microhardness.…”
Section: Effect Of Solidification Rate On Microhardnesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The average microhardness values measured on the longitudinal and transverse sections of the samples are given in Table 1 52 , Liu et al 53 , Frear et al 54 and Ghosh 55 , respectively. The exponent value (0.13-0.14) of the V (for lamellar structure) is in good agreement with the value of 0.14, 0.11, 0.15, values obtained by Zhang et al 7 for Ni-25at.%Si alloy, by Hu et al 56 for Sn-1.0 wt.% Cu, by Fan et al 57 for Ti-46Al-0.5W-0.5Si alloy (at.%), respectively. Decrease in lamellar spacing due to the increasing solidification rate, increased the microhardness.…”
Section: Effect Of Solidification Rate On Microhardnesssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The exponent values of V (0.04-0.06) obtained in this study are in good agreement with the values of 0,05, 0.08, 0.09, 0.04 and 0.07 reported by Çadırlı et al 24 for Al-Cu-Co eutectic, Aker et al 22 for Al-Sb eutectic, Kaya et al 33 for Al-Si eutectic, Guo et al 34 for NiAl-28Cr-5Mo-1Hf (at%), Lapin and Marecek 35 for Ni-21.9Al-8.1Cr-4.2Ta-0.9Mo-0.3Zr (at%), respectively. But, this exponent value is lower than the values of 0.14, 0.15 and 0.16 reported by Lapin et al 36 for Ti-46Al-2W-0.5Si (at%), Fan et al 37 for Ti-46Al-0.5W-0.5Si (at%) and Fan et al 38 for Ti-49 at% Al alloy, respectively. Figure 10b shows the values of σ u as a function of C o .…”
Section: Effect Of Growth Velocity and Fe Content On The Tensile Propcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…The exponent value of V (0.07) for HV is lower than the values of 0.11, 0.14, and 0.15 reported by Hu et al [61] for Sn-1.0 wt pct Cu, by Lapin et al [62] for Ti-46Al-2W-0.5Si (at. pct) alloy, and by Fan et al [63] for Ti-46Al-0.5W-0.5Si alloy (at pct), respectively. The average exponent value of k 1 (0.29) obtained in this study as a function of the HV is slightly higher than the values of 0.22, 0.24, 0.21, 0.20, 0.25, and 0.28 reported by Bo¨yu¨k et al [64] for Al-17.6Cu-42.2Ag (wt pct) alloy, by Engin et al [65] for Zn-5 wt pct Al alloy, by Hu et al [61] for Sn-1.0 wt pct Cu alloy, by Hu et al [66] for Sn-40.5Pb-2.6Sb (wt pct) alloy, by Kaya et al [60] for Al-0.1 wt pct Ti alloy, and by Kaya et al [67] for Al-3 wt pct Si alloy, respectively.…”
Section: The Effect Of Dendritic Spacing and Growth Rate On Microhmentioning
confidence: 90%