2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02164-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency Management in Smart Homes

Abstract: In future smart homes functionality will be provided to the inhabitants by software services decoupled from the underlying hardware devices. While this will enhance flexibility and will allow to provide cross-functionalities across multiple devices it will also lead to resource conflicts. Future devices will provide basic functionalities which are used by separate higher level services. Each person will use a number of different services and each environment can be inhabited by multiple users at the same time.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gorgeous homes these days provide similar availableness tothe tip client. That availableness depends on the running with [20]: between versatile application and structure. It depends on the controller that it's utilizing.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…gorgeous homes these days provide similar availableness tothe tip client. That availableness depends on the running with [20]: between versatile application and structure. It depends on the controller that it's utilizing.…”
Section: Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to consider conflict handling as a special case of dependency management, taking also into account the current "state", and priorities. In [10], AOP and "exclusive binding" are used, while [4] propose a DSL in which exclusive actions, ACL, priorities and required resources are defined; from this DSL, conflicts are detected and code is generated. However these approaches are preliminary and ignore many device management issues; dynamic evolution is not really supported since any change requires recompiling, regenerating and redeploying the whole system.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Further invocation dependencies which may exist during the service use within compositions are not subject to our approach; existing comparisons of these are well-known [7], [8]. …”
Section: A Cloud Service Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%