1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08284.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of thermal thresholds in man on the rate of temperature change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If one considers data related to the hand with a ∼10 cm 2 area of stimulation, the detectable changes of temperature were found to be in the 1–5°C range [19][20], [38][42]. The measured warm thresholds were related directly to the rate of temperature changes, being in fact apparent thresholds as defined in the present paper; accordingly, the differences were generally attributed to the reaction time artifact [19], [39][40], [43][44]. On the other hand, the forced choice method of levels applied in similar conditions provided remarkably reproducible detectable changes of temperature in the 0.6–0.7°C range [19], [38], [40], [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…If one considers data related to the hand with a ∼10 cm 2 area of stimulation, the detectable changes of temperature were found to be in the 1–5°C range [19][20], [38][42]. The measured warm thresholds were related directly to the rate of temperature changes, being in fact apparent thresholds as defined in the present paper; accordingly, the differences were generally attributed to the reaction time artifact [19], [39][40], [43][44]. On the other hand, the forced choice method of levels applied in similar conditions provided remarkably reproducible detectable changes of temperature in the 0.6–0.7°C range [19], [38], [40], [45].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…A clinical examination included inspection of the hands, blood pressure, touch sensation, and Adson, Allen, Tinel, and Phalen tests. The objective tests were performed in the following order ( a ) grip strength, ( b ) a modified Moberg pickup test,11 ( c ) aesthesiometry as described by Renfrew and modified by Carlson,12-14( d ) vibrotactile threshold with an HVLab vibrometer,15 16 ( e ) measurement of the thermal neutral zones and thermal pain thresholds with the Sonemedic Thermotest,17 18 and ( f ) a controlled cold provocation test 15°C for 5 minutes 19…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habituation occurs with repeated stimuli, especially when testing heat pain (Agostinho et al, 2009). The rate of temperature change during testing affects thresholds (higher rate results in higher thresholds) in the reaction time-dependent test algorithm (limits) (Croze and Duclaux, 1978;Pertovaara and Kojo, 1985;Swerup and Nilsson, 1987;Yarnitsky and Ochoa, 1990;Yarnitsky and Ochoa, 1991;Hilz et al, 1995b;1996;Pertovaara et al, 1996;Palmer et al, 2000;Maeda and Sakakibara, 2002). Higher rates may also increase intra-subject variability (Hilz et al, 1995a;Nielsen and Arendt-Nielsen, 1998).…”
Section: Settings Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%