2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.12.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of submerged jet heat transfer on nozzle length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result indicates that the sharp inlet of the nozzle does not influence the nozzle exit velocity profiles. This result is consistent with the literature (Kashi & Haustein 2018), where it is reported that the nozzle exit velocity profiles are not influenced by a sharp inlet if ( is Reynolds number based on average velocity and nozzle diameter). For the maximum average Reynolds number () studied in the present experiments, the above condition gives , which is lower than the minimum () used in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result indicates that the sharp inlet of the nozzle does not influence the nozzle exit velocity profiles. This result is consistent with the literature (Kashi & Haustein 2018), where it is reported that the nozzle exit velocity profiles are not influenced by a sharp inlet if ( is Reynolds number based on average velocity and nozzle diameter). For the maximum average Reynolds number () studied in the present experiments, the above condition gives , which is lower than the minimum () used in the present study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result indicates that the sharp inlet of the nozzle does not influence the nozzle exit velocity profiles. This result is consistent with the literature (Kashi & Haustein 2018), where it is reported that the nozzle exit velocity profiles are not influenced by a sharp inlet if L/(D Re av ) > 0.0015 (Re av is Reynolds number based on average velocity and The self-similar laminar boundary layer profile (Blasius profile) is invariant, so the laminar velocity profile at the nozzle exit can be uniquely represented by D/θ 0 . The non-dimensional momentum thickness D/θ is calculated using (4.1),…”
Section: Inlet Flow Conditionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present work two-phase numerical solutions of the Navier-Stokes and energy equations were applied to obtain detailed descriptions of the velocity and pressure fields, as well as the wall-side heat transfer, of impinging jets in the range of Re = 600-2000. The numerical methods are described in detail in a previous work [24,27], and given here briefly. The flow was simulated with an unsteady solver until a steady velocity field was observed and verified, i.e., doubling the simulated time (up to 6.4 s) resulted in negligible change in the velocity profile (<1%).…”
Section: The Direct Heat Transfer Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33] eş hidrolik çapa sahip farklı formdaki jet nozülleri ile soğutulan ve yüzeyinde üçgen engeller bulunan düz bir plakadan taşınımla ısı transferini 900 ile 11000 Reynolds sayısı aralığında deneysel olarak incelemişlerdir. Kashi ve Haustein [34] akış bölgesi içerisine uzatılmış bir jet nozülünün taşınımla ısı transferine etkilerini Reynolds sayısının 500 ile 2000 aralığında sayısal olarak incelemişlerdir. Gürtürk ve Öztop [35] üzerinde gözenekli metal köpük bulunan ısıtılmış bir diskin dairesel kesitli bir jet nozülü ile soğutulmasını deneysel olarak incelemişlerdir.…”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified