Strength and Failure of Visco-Elastic Materials 1968
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-003110-1.50011-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Strength of Elastomers on Strain Rate and Type of Filler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This appears to be the case for the brittle-like failure scenario of casein gels that are well modeled by Fiber Bundle Models that verify the former hypothesis [5,35,36]. The Bailey criterion reads cess σ(t), and F (σ) is the dependence of the time to rupture for creep experiments performed at a series of constant imposed stresses σ [17]. Independent creep tests have been performed on casein gels [5] and indicate that F (σ) = Aσ −β where A is a scale parameter, with A = (7.6 ± 0.1) × 10 13 s.Pa β and β = 5.5 ± 0.1 for the 4% wt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This appears to be the case for the brittle-like failure scenario of casein gels that are well modeled by Fiber Bundle Models that verify the former hypothesis [5,35,36]. The Bailey criterion reads cess σ(t), and F (σ) is the dependence of the time to rupture for creep experiments performed at a series of constant imposed stresses σ [17]. Independent creep tests have been performed on casein gels [5] and indicate that F (σ) = Aσ −β where A is a scale parameter, with A = (7.6 ± 0.1) × 10 13 s.Pa β and β = 5.5 ± 0.1 for the 4% wt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…cess σ(t), and F (σ) is the dependence of the time to rupture for creep experiments performed at a series of constant imposed stresses σ [17]. Independent creep tests have been performed on casein gels [5] and indicate that F = Aσ −β where A is a scale parameter, with A = (7.6 ± 0.1) × 10 13 s.Pa β and β = 5.5 ± 0.1 for the 4% wt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations