1997
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10102366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of forced vital capacity manoeuvre on time course of preceding inspiration in patients with restrictive lung disease

Abstract: In normal subjects and patients with airway obstruction, flows during a forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre are higher after a fast inspiration without an end-inspiratory pause (manoeuvre 1) as compared to a slow inspiration with an end-expiratory pause of ~5 s (manoeuvre 2). In this study, we investigated the influence of these manoeuvres on maximal expiratory volume-time and flow-volume curves in patients with restrictive lung disease.Eleven patients with restrictive lung disease were studied. Their averag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the previous volume and time history of a spontaneous tidal breath is necessarily different from that of a forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre, it is axiomatic that comparison of tidal expiratory flow-volume with MEFV curves is problematic. In fact, there is not a single MEFV curve, but rather a family of different curves, which depend on the time-course of the inspiration preceding the FVC manoeuvre [15][16][17]. Therefore, comparison of tidal expiratory flow-volume and MEFV curves is incorrect.…”
Section: Conventional Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the previous volume and time history of a spontaneous tidal breath is necessarily different from that of a forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre, it is axiomatic that comparison of tidal expiratory flow-volume with MEFV curves is problematic. In fact, there is not a single MEFV curve, but rather a family of different curves, which depend on the time-course of the inspiration preceding the FVC manoeuvre [15][16][17]. Therefore, comparison of tidal expiratory flow-volume and MEFV curves is incorrect.…”
Section: Conventional Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is axiomatic that comparison of tidal with maximal flow-volume curves is problematic. In fact, there is not a single maximal flow-volume curve but rather a family of different curves, which depend on the time course of the inspiration preceding the FVC manoeuvre [35][36][37]. 4) Respiratory mechanics and time constant inequalities are different during the tidal and maximal expiratory efforts, again making comparisons of the two flow-volume curves problematic [38][39][40].…”
Section: Conventional (Hyatt's) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies showed that F maneuvers were associated with greater peak expiratory flows in both normal volunteers (D'Angelo et al 1993;Wanger et al 1996) and patients with various lung diseases (Braggion et al 1996;D'Angelo et al 1994;Koulouris et al 1997;Wanger et al 1996). Since the inter-maneuver differences in some measured pulmonary parameters could be as high as 40% (Braggion et al 1996;D'Angelo et al 1993D'Angelo et al , 1994Koulouris et al 1997;Wanger et al 1996), it was suggested that measurement of forced vital capacity should be standardized taking into consideration the speed of preceding inspiration (Braggion et al 1996;Wanger et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%