2017
DOI: 10.2514/1.t4952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Calculated Postshock Thermodynamic Variables on Vibrational Equilibrium and Input Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incident shock wave velocities ranged from 1.1 -2.9 km/s generating equilibrium temperatures from 1250 -3460 K and equilibrium pressures from 0.03 -0.17 atm. From the normal shock relations solver [19], the measured temperatures after relaxation and equilibrium temperatures can be compared to validate the sensor and method. The deviation of the measured temperatures with the simulated shock temperature from theory [19], is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Incident shock wave velocities ranged from 1.1 -2.9 km/s generating equilibrium temperatures from 1250 -3460 K and equilibrium pressures from 0.03 -0.17 atm. From the normal shock relations solver [19], the measured temperatures after relaxation and equilibrium temperatures can be compared to validate the sensor and method. The deviation of the measured temperatures with the simulated shock temperature from theory [19], is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the normal shock relations solver [19], the measured temperatures after relaxation and equilibrium temperatures can be compared to validate the sensor and method. The deviation of the measured temperatures with the simulated shock temperature from theory [19], is shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is expected because translational and rotational energy modes equilibrate significantly faster than the vibrational energy mode [ 14 , 34 ]. The energy modes are also seen to equilibrate to the temperature predicted from the normal shock relations solver [ 28 ], indicating an accurate and quantitative temperature measurement.…”
Section: Results/sensor Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 illustrates the solution method. The density profile behind the incident shock is modeled by an exponential increase from the vibrationally frozen density predicted from the normal shock relations solver [ 28 ] to the equilibrium number density after relaxation. Figure 4 shows the absorbance area of the R(103) feature is most sensitive to over the temperature range of 1500–3000 K. While any line area may be theoretically used to infer a value, the R(103) and R(104) lines are preferentially used here as R(58) can be optically thick, and R(140) is often optically thin.…”
Section: Methods and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all experiments, reflected shock pressure in the shock tube test section is measured directly with a dynamic pressure transducer (Kistler 601B1) via a charge amplifier (Kistler 5018A) and temperature is inferred from the shock wave speed determined via time of arrival sensors (Dynasen, Inc.) along the shock tube. Uncertainties in reflected shock test conditions are typically about 1% when properly accounting for vibrational relaxation of all components of the test gas [30].…”
Section: B Experimental and Optical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%