1996
DOI: 10.1109/36.536525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of attenuation in a vegetation canopy on frequency and plant water content

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface roughness is related to the vegetation opacity, and this determines VegWC under the assumption of a uniformly vegetated surface in a unit area. This approach is derived from a linear relationship between the vegetation opacity and vegetation water content (Jackson and Schmugge 1991;Le Vine and Karam 1996). Hence, VegWC can be also defined as total water mass in vegetation per unit of ground area, including leaves as well as stalks and branches.…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface roughness is related to the vegetation opacity, and this determines VegWC under the assumption of a uniformly vegetated surface in a unit area. This approach is derived from a linear relationship between the vegetation opacity and vegetation water content (Jackson and Schmugge 1991;Le Vine and Karam 1996). Hence, VegWC can be also defined as total water mass in vegetation per unit of ground area, including leaves as well as stalks and branches.…”
Section: ϫ2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shallower incidence angles (near 40 degree) increase the path length through vegetation thus maximizing the crop response and better classification capabilities (Le Toan et al, 1984). Levine and Karam (1996) reported that attenuation through vegetation is proportional to vegetation water content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has, however, shown that the opacity coefficient depends on both the gravimetric water content of vegetation (Wigneron et al, 1996(Wigneron et al, , 2000Le Vine and Karam, 1996) and the temperature (Wigneron et al, 2000). In addition, the canopy type and structure (Jackson and Schmugge, 1991), the polarisation (van de Griend and Owe, 1996) and wavelength of the radiation (Jackson and Schmugge, 1991) and the look-angle of the sensor (van de Griend and Owe, 1996) may also influence the opacity coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%