Abstract:Lipids are the major form of carbon storage in arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi. We studied fatty acid synthesis by Glomus intraradices and Gigaspora rosea. Our data strongly suggest that the fatty acid synthase activity of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi is expressed exclusively in the intraradical mycelium and indicate that fatty acid metabolism may play a major role in the obligate biotrophism of arbuscular-mycorrhizal fungi.
“…AM fungi store and transport most of their carbon in the form of lipids [9][10][11][12]. However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13].…”
Section: Lipid Metabolism In Am Fungi -Open Questions and Surprisesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Given the absence of the FAS-I complex from AM fungi, and the fact that lipids are the main storage form of carbon in AM fungi, the transfer of lipids from the plant to the fungus would circumvent the metabolically inefficient conversion of sugars to FAs through glycolysis, pyruvate decarboxylation, and the mitochondrial FAS-II pathway in the IRM of the fungus. However, Trépanier and colleagues have refuted the transfer of C16 from the plant to the fungus based on the fact that the relative labeling of fungal FAs (vs plant FAs) was >10-fold higher when mycorrhizal roots were supplemented with labeled sucrose versus when they received labeled acetate [13]. Because the conversion of sucrose to FAs in the plant would require a transition through acetyl-CoA, it would be expected that a similar level of labeling should be generated with both sucrose and acetate if the FAs were produced in the plant and transferred to the fungus[…”
Section: Non-membrane Lipid Functions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13]. Taken together, the available evidence suggests that AM fungi take up sugars (mainly glucose), then convert them to lipids in the IRM for the export to the ERM (and to the spores), where a significant proportion of the lipids is converted back to carbohydrates by the glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis [14,15].…”
Section: Lipid Metabolism In Am Fungi -Open Questions and Surprisesmentioning
Most plants entertain mutualistic interactions known as arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) with soil fungi (Glomeromycota) which provide them with mineral nutrients in exchange for reduced carbon from the plant. Mycorrhizal roots represent strong carbon sinks in which hexoses are transferred from the plant host to the fungus. However, most of the carbon in AM fungi is stored in the form of lipids. The absence of the type I fatty acid synthase (FAS-I) complex from the AM fungal model species Rhizophagus irregularis suggests that lipids may also have a role in nutrition of the fungal partner. This hypothesis is supported by the concerted induction of host genes involved in lipid metabolism. We explore the possible roles of lipids in the light of recent literature on AM symbiosis.
Carbohydrates in AM Fungal NutritionAM fungi are strictly biotrophic, in other words they depend on their host to complete their life cycle. Although the basis of biotrophy is poorly understood, it has been suggested that it is due to the dependency of AM fungi on some essential nutritional factor(s) from the host [1]. Direct uptake measurements revealed that intraradical mycelium (IRM) can take up carbohydrates, whereas extraradical mycelium (ERM) did not acquire significant amounts of carbohydrates [2,3]. Perhaps this is because AM fungal genes involved in nutrient uptake are expressed only in the host, which would explain their biotrophy. Tracer studies on mycorrhizal roots, and respirometric analysis on isolated intraradical hyphae have established glucose as a central substrate for AM fungi [3][4][5], and indeed a monosaccharide transporter has been identified in the fungal partner [6]. Mycorrhizal roots represent strong carbon sinks [2,4,7], suggesting that they attract sucrose from photosynthetic source tissues. Sucrose is thought to be cleaved in the vicinity of the fungus by invertases and sucrose synthase [8], resulting in monosaccharides (glucose and fructose) that are released to the fungus and taken up by its IRM [5,6]. However, in the fungal storage compartments -the spores and the vesicles -carbon is stored primarily in the form of lipids, with minor amounts of the glucose polymer glycogen. We discuss here salient issues relating to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in AM fungi and their significance for fungal nutrition during symbiosis.
Lipid Metabolism in AM Fungi -Open Questions and SurprisesAlthough the aforementioned carbon fluxes in AM fungi have been firmly established, several questions remain open. AM fungi store and transport most of their carbon in the form of lipids [9][10][11][12]. However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13]. Taken together, the available evidence suggests that AM fungi take up sugars (...
“…AM fungi store and transport most of their carbon in the form of lipids [9][10][11][12]. However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13].…”
Section: Lipid Metabolism In Am Fungi -Open Questions and Surprisesmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Given the absence of the FAS-I complex from AM fungi, and the fact that lipids are the main storage form of carbon in AM fungi, the transfer of lipids from the plant to the fungus would circumvent the metabolically inefficient conversion of sugars to FAs through glycolysis, pyruvate decarboxylation, and the mitochondrial FAS-II pathway in the IRM of the fungus. However, Trépanier and colleagues have refuted the transfer of C16 from the plant to the fungus based on the fact that the relative labeling of fungal FAs (vs plant FAs) was >10-fold higher when mycorrhizal roots were supplemented with labeled sucrose versus when they received labeled acetate [13]. Because the conversion of sucrose to FAs in the plant would require a transition through acetyl-CoA, it would be expected that a similar level of labeling should be generated with both sucrose and acetate if the FAs were produced in the plant and transferred to the fungus[…”
Section: Non-membrane Lipid Functions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13]. Taken together, the available evidence suggests that AM fungi take up sugars (mainly glucose), then convert them to lipids in the IRM for the export to the ERM (and to the spores), where a significant proportion of the lipids is converted back to carbohydrates by the glyoxylate cycle and gluconeogenesis [14,15].…”
Section: Lipid Metabolism In Am Fungi -Open Questions and Surprisesmentioning
Most plants entertain mutualistic interactions known as arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) with soil fungi (Glomeromycota) which provide them with mineral nutrients in exchange for reduced carbon from the plant. Mycorrhizal roots represent strong carbon sinks in which hexoses are transferred from the plant host to the fungus. However, most of the carbon in AM fungi is stored in the form of lipids. The absence of the type I fatty acid synthase (FAS-I) complex from the AM fungal model species Rhizophagus irregularis suggests that lipids may also have a role in nutrition of the fungal partner. This hypothesis is supported by the concerted induction of host genes involved in lipid metabolism. We explore the possible roles of lipids in the light of recent literature on AM symbiosis.
Carbohydrates in AM Fungal NutritionAM fungi are strictly biotrophic, in other words they depend on their host to complete their life cycle. Although the basis of biotrophy is poorly understood, it has been suggested that it is due to the dependency of AM fungi on some essential nutritional factor(s) from the host [1]. Direct uptake measurements revealed that intraradical mycelium (IRM) can take up carbohydrates, whereas extraradical mycelium (ERM) did not acquire significant amounts of carbohydrates [2,3]. Perhaps this is because AM fungal genes involved in nutrient uptake are expressed only in the host, which would explain their biotrophy. Tracer studies on mycorrhizal roots, and respirometric analysis on isolated intraradical hyphae have established glucose as a central substrate for AM fungi [3][4][5], and indeed a monosaccharide transporter has been identified in the fungal partner [6]. Mycorrhizal roots represent strong carbon sinks [2,4,7], suggesting that they attract sucrose from photosynthetic source tissues. Sucrose is thought to be cleaved in the vicinity of the fungus by invertases and sucrose synthase [8], resulting in monosaccharides (glucose and fructose) that are released to the fungus and taken up by its IRM [5,6]. However, in the fungal storage compartments -the spores and the vesicles -carbon is stored primarily in the form of lipids, with minor amounts of the glucose polymer glycogen. We discuss here salient issues relating to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in AM fungi and their significance for fungal nutrition during symbiosis.
Lipid Metabolism in AM Fungi -Open Questions and SurprisesAlthough the aforementioned carbon fluxes in AM fungi have been firmly established, several questions remain open. AM fungi store and transport most of their carbon in the form of lipids [9][10][11][12]. However, AM fungi cannot produce the basic fatty acid (FA) palmitate (C16) in the absence of their host (as shown in two distantly related species, Rhizophagus irregularis and Gigaspora rosea), while FA elongation and desaturation can occur independently of the plant [13]. This and similar results suggested that AM fungi can only synthesize C16 in the IRM [3,13]. Taken together, the available evidence suggests that AM fungi take up sugars (...
“…Hyperforin biosynthesis in H. perforatum starts from amino acid precursors and proceeds with prenylation (Karppinen et al 2007). It has been shown that AMF can decrease free amino acid content and saturated fatty acid content in host plants (Rivero et al 2015;Saia et al 2015b) and that AMF depend on their host plants for the biosynthesis of some special fatty acids (Trepanier et al 2005). Hence, it is likely that hyperforin biosynthesis decreases in mycorrhizal rather than in control plants due to a sequestration of precursors needed by the AMF.…”
St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum) is a perennial herb able to produce water-soluble active ingredients (a.i.), mostly in flowers, with a wide range of medicinal and biotechnological uses. However, information about the ability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) to affect its biomass accumulation, flower production, and concentration of a.i. under contrasting nutrient availability is still scarce. In the present experiment, we evaluated the role of AMF on growth, flower production, and concentration of bioactive secondary metabolites (hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin) of H. perforatum under contrasting P availability. AMF stimulated the production of aboveground biomass under low P conditions and increased the production of root biomass. AMF almost halved the number of flowers per plant by means of a reduction of the number of flower-bearing stems per plant under high P availability and through a lower number of flowers per stem in the low-P treatment. Flower hyperforin concentration was 17.5% lower in mycorrhizal than in non-mycorrhizal plants. On the contrary, pseudohypericin and hypericin concentrations increased by 166.8 and 279.2%, respectively, with AMF under low P availability, whereas no effect of AMF was found under high P availability. These results have implications for modulating the secondary metabolite production of H. perforatum. However, further studies are needed to evaluate the competition for photosynthates between AMF and flowers at different nutrient availabilities for both plant and AM fungus.
“…The widespread occurrence of AM symbioses today (Smith and Read, 2008) indicates that they continue to play key roles in terrestrial ecology. Growth and spore development of AM fungi depends on successful colonization of roots to access plant carbohydrates and convert them into fatty acids and other compounds (Solaiman et al, 1999;Trépanier et al, 2005). In return, AM fungi take up minerals, especially Pi, from the soil and deliver them to their host plants (Marschner and Dell, 1994).…”
A key feature of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is improved phosphorus nutrition of the host plant via the mycorrhizal pathway, i.e., the fungal uptake of Pi from the soil and its release from arbuscules within root cells. Efficient transport of Pi from the fungus to plant cells is thought to require a proton gradient across the periarbuscular membrane (PAM) that separates fungal arbuscules from the host cell cytoplasm. Previous studies showed that the H + -ATPase gene HA1 is expressed specifically in arbusculecontaining root cells of Medicago truncatula. We isolated a ha1-2 mutant of M. truncatula and found it to be impaired in the development of arbuscules but not in root colonization by Rhizophagus irregularis hyphae. Artificial microRNA silencing of HA1 recapitulated this phenotype, resulting in small and truncated arbuscules. Unlike the wild type, the ha1-2 mutant failed to show a positive growth response to mycorrhizal colonization under Pi-limiting conditions. Uptake experiments confirmed that ha1-2 mutants are unable to take up phosphate via the mycorrhizal pathway. Increased pH in the apoplast of abnormal arbusculecontaining cells of the ha1-2 mutant compared with the wild type suggests that HA1 is crucial for building a proton gradient across the PAM and therefore is indispensible for the transfer of Pi from the fungus to the plant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.