2019 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/seaa.2019.00066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependable Fog Computing: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract: Fog computing has been recently introduced to bridge the gap between cloud resources and the network edge. Fog enables low latency and location awareness, which is considered instrumental for the realization of IoT, but also faces reliability and dependability issues due to node mobility and resource constraints. This paper focuses on the latter, and surveys the state of the art concerning dependability and fog computing, by means of a systematic literature review. Our findings show the growing interest in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A notable flaw with fog computing is that its fault tolerance level has not been extensively studied. The only results available on fault tolerance for fog computing in the current literature are for node failures [99]. This flaw could be resolved by implementing fog computing into Blockchain, by partitioning fog node clusters using fog nodes within a Blockchain [100].…”
Section: Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable flaw with fog computing is that its fault tolerance level has not been extensively studied. The only results available on fault tolerance for fog computing in the current literature are for node failures [99]. This flaw could be resolved by implementing fog computing into Blockchain, by partitioning fog node clusters using fog nodes within a Blockchain [100].…”
Section: Fog Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding studies that present definitions on dependability and trustworthiness, some papers explore the state of the art and definitions [9], [42], [43], [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. We also found surveys on trustworthiness [64][65][66][67][68] and dependability [69] and a systematic literature review (SLR) on dependability [70].…”
Section: ) Conceptualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In computer systems, a failure represents an unexpected behavior. In the IoT data domain, it is possible to exemplify some of these behaviors as data integrity loss due to semantic/syntactic vulnerabilities, packet loss due to network interference or connection loss between fog nodes [70], and data loss caused by network exhaustion or device memory overflow.…”
Section: ) Fault Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed dependability solutions are mainly tied to redundancy methods and replication techniques, for instance, using passive/ active replicas of the system components. However, using replicas for each component will result in overhead of cost and consumption of resources [59], and it can also impact the scalability of the overall system. Therefore, we need further research to improve the system dependability.…”
Section: E Dependability and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%