2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deoxynivalenol (DON) naturally contaminated feed impairs the immune response induced by porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) live attenuated vaccine

Abstract: 13Cereal commodities are frequently contaminated with mycotoxins produced by the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, DON-ingestion did not influence the number of log copies detected in the M. hyopneumoniae infected animals. Similarly, Savard et al [ 61 ] did not observe an effect of DON-contamination on the presence of viral RNA, measured with qPCR, in PRRSv-infected pigs. It is not clear why the obtained effects of dietary DON vary among experiments, It might be explained by different factors such as starting weight or age of the pigs, the contamination source of DON (natural versus artificial contamination), presence of other known or unknown undetected fungal metabolites or pathogens, duration of the study (adaptation), number of pigs used in the study, gender of the pigs, health status, nutritional balance of the pig and statistical design of the study [ 10 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, DON-ingestion did not influence the number of log copies detected in the M. hyopneumoniae infected animals. Similarly, Savard et al [ 61 ] did not observe an effect of DON-contamination on the presence of viral RNA, measured with qPCR, in PRRSv-infected pigs. It is not clear why the obtained effects of dietary DON vary among experiments, It might be explained by different factors such as starting weight or age of the pigs, the contamination source of DON (natural versus artificial contamination), presence of other known or unknown undetected fungal metabolites or pathogens, duration of the study (adaptation), number of pigs used in the study, gender of the pigs, health status, nutritional balance of the pig and statistical design of the study [ 10 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…More research is needed to investigate this relationship in pigs, for instance by in vitro tests on pig tracheal explants. On the other hand discrepancies have been reported between in vivo (higher viremia in pigs exposed to DON in the feed) and in vitro (decreased PRRSv replication in MARC-cells) effects of DON on PRRSv [ 18 , 61 ], thus extrapolation of in vitro results to in vivo effects has to be done cautiously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, feeding pigs a DON-contaminated diet was shown to inhibit the vaccination efficiency of PRRSV modified live vaccine by severely impairing viral replication ( Savard et al., 2015a ).…”
Section: Consequence Of Mycotoxin Induced Immunomodulation For Pig Hementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following intestinal absorption, DON reaches the liver via the portal vein. As both, intestine and liver with their quickly proliferating cells, have a high protein turnover rate (Savard et al 2015 ), they are considered as DON-sensitive organs (Ueno 1984 ). Following oral consumption of DON, negative effects on liver and serum parameters were found (D’Mello et al 1999 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%