Deontological evidentialism, wide-scope, and privileged values

Oliveira, Luis R. G.

doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0693-4

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I won't pursue that line of argument here, but see Perrine (forthcoming) for a recent discussion of the doxastic puzzle and matters of responsibility. 17 I have argued elsewhere against versions of evidentialism stated in terms of prescriptive ought-claims (Oliveira 2017(Oliveira , 2018a, and against internalist notions of justification stated in agential terms (Oliveira 2015(Oliveira , 2018b).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evading the Doxastic Puzzle by Deflating Epistemic Normativity

Oliveira¹

2020

Epistemic Duties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evading the Doxastic Puzzle by Deflating Epistemic Normativity

Oliveira¹

2020

Epistemic Duties

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…I won't pursue that line of argument here, but see Perrine (forthcoming) for a recent discussion of the doxastic puzzle and matters of responsibility. I have argued elsewhere against versions of evidentialism stated in terms of prescriptive ought-claims (Oliveira 2017(Oliveira , 2018a, and against internalist notions of justification stated in agential terms (Oliveira 2015(Oliveira , 2018b.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epistemic Duties

McCain¹,

Stapleford²

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are arguably moral, legal, and prudential constraints on behavior. But are there epistemic constraints on belief? Are there any requirements arising from intellectual considerations alone? This volume includes original essays written by top epistemologists that address this and closely related questions from a variety of new, sometimes unexpected, angles. It features a wide variety of positions, ranging from arguments for and against the existence of purely epistemic requirements, reductions of epistemic requirements to moral or prudential requirements, the biological foundations of epistemic requirements, extensions of the scope of epistemic requirements to include such things as open-mindedness, eradication of implicit bias and interpersonal duties to object, to new applications such as epistemic requirements pertaining to storytelling, testimony, and fundamentalist beliefs. Anyone interested in the nature of responsibility, belief, or epistemic normativity will find a range of useful arguments and fresh ideas in this cutting-edge anthology.

show abstract

“…According to Mascarenhas (2019), deontological ethics does right by the elimination of humanity's moral standards and place them in something with absolute authority. Regrettably, deontologists have argued over the years about the authority's source (Oliveira, 2017). However, the bible is unambiguous in that God created us to communicate with him (John 15:14-15).…”

Section: Concept Of Deontologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Examination of Aspects of Deontological and Teleological Theories that Promote Professional Practice

Adu¹,

Mensah²

2023

IJARAFMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expectations regarding appropriate business and professional practices have changed dramatically over the years. Corporations and organizations now face an era of heightened accountability beyond shareholders to stakeholders interested in how they achieve their objectives. The challenge in recent times is the adoption of appropriate ethical principles that not only lead to the ethical realisation of profits but also respect the interests of others. The examination of the aspects of deontological and teleological theories that promote professional practice is critical in contemporary times. This article therefore proposes a literature review of the aspects of deontological and teleological theories that promote professional practice.

show abstract

Deontological evidentialism, wide-scope, and privileged values

Cited by 12 publications

References 27 publications

Evading the Doxastic Puzzle by Deflating Epistemic Normativity

Evading the Doxastic Puzzle by Deflating Epistemic Normativity

Epistemic Duties

Examination of Aspects of Deontological and Teleological Theories that Promote Professional Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About