2022
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deontological and Utilitarian Responses to Sacrificial Dilemmas Predict Disapproval of Sin Stocks

Abstract: Abstract. Investors sometimes invest in the so-called “sin” stocks that cause social harm as a by-product of doing business (e.g., tobacco companies). Three studies examined whether people who reject harm and maximize outcomes in sacrificial dilemmas approve less of investing in sin (but not conventional) stocks. We employed process dissociation to assess harm-rejection (deontological) and outcome-maximization (utilitarian) response tendencies independently. Study 1 ( N = 337) assessed moral approval of stocks… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative approaches could be used, such as focusing on the industry in which the company operates in (e.g., gambling). However, past work suggests that alternative operationalizations of 'sin' produce similar findings as the current manipulations (Niszczota et al, 2022). We cannot rule out that the lack of direct support for the ethical commitment hypothesis -postulating that investment in sin stocks backfires for ethical fund managers -is due to a different operationalization of saintliness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Alternative approaches could be used, such as focusing on the industry in which the company operates in (e.g., gambling). However, past work suggests that alternative operationalizations of 'sin' produce similar findings as the current manipulations (Niszczota et al, 2022). We cannot rule out that the lack of direct support for the ethical commitment hypothesis -postulating that investment in sin stocks backfires for ethical fund managers -is due to a different operationalization of saintliness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Spółkę można także uznać za grzeszną, jeśli zaprzestaje ona wcześniejszych społecznie odpowiedzialnych działań (między innymi Niszczota i in., 2022). Do tego można wykorzystać na przykład zmianę w ocenie agencji ratingowych albo całościowo (na przykład obniżkę z oceny AA na BB), albo tylko w wybranych wymiarach (na przykład traktowanie pracowników).…”
Section: Alternatywne Ujęciaunclassified
“…To understand the effects of errors suggested by decision support systems we focus on the analysis of a set of "activist" investment funds that conduct negative activism (Molk and Partnoy, 2022). These are known to target companies that they deem fraudulent or exploitative (Jiang et al, 2022), which in a broader sense could be considered "sin stocks" (Hong and Kacperczyk, 2009;Niszczota et al, 2022). If an activist fund can convince other market participants that such a company is guilty, the stock price of the company should substantially decrease.…”
Section: Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%