Dentine hypersensitivity—Into the 21st century

Orchardson, R.; Gangarosa, Louis P.; Holland, G.; Pashley, David H.; Trowbridge, Henry O.; Ashley, F P; Kleinberg, I.; Zappa, U.

doi:10.1016/0003-9969(94)90197-x

Cited by 42 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1 CDH is characterized by an acute and short-term pain, which can be triggered by the touch of an instrument, brush bristles, and cold or sweet food and drinks. 2 The population prevalence of CDH ranges from 10% to 20% at age 40, and it affects mainly canines and premolars.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2 The population prevalence of CDH ranges from 10% to 20% at age 40, and it affects mainly canines and premolars. 1,3 To date, no method has been developed to resolve CDH satisfactorily, and recurrences are common. 4 Patients with CDH must be thoroughly evaluated for the diagnosis and control of etiological factors, because the treatment must achieve rapid and permanent pain relief.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions – a single-blind, split-mouth study

Neto

et al. 2015

Braz. oral res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to compare the in vivo effect of a desensitizing therapy associated with a restorative technique for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity (CDH) in non-carious lesions. The sample consisted of 68 teeth with moderate or severe dentin hypersensitivity in 17 individuals (one tooth per quadrant). The sensitivity levels of the teeth were scored, and the teeth were randomly distributed into four groups: T1 -desensitizing gel applied once per week until remission of pain; T2 -desensitizing gel applied once per week followed immediately by restoration with resin composite (Filtek Z250, 3M Espe); T3 -desensitizing gel once per week until remission of pain and then restoration with resin composite; and T4 -restoration with resin composite. Dentin hypersensitivity was assessed at 0, 7, 30, 90 and 180 days. The Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney (p < 0.05) tests were used to compare the treatments. The mean baseline CDH scores were T1 -2.41, T2 -2.41, T3 -2.47, and T4 -2.70 (p > 0.05). At seven and 180 days, the mean CDH scores were as follows: T1 -1.47/0.65, T2 -1.35/0.71, T3 -0.71/0.53, and T4 -1.12/0.59, all of which were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the baseline scores. The scores at 30, 90 and 180 days were not significantly different when compared to the score of the previous period. At 180 days, CDH scores were similar among groups (p > 0.05). Teeth with moderate or severe hypersensitivity that required a filling responded similarly regardless of whether the desensitizing procedure was carried out prior to the filling.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions – a single-blind, split-mouth study

Neto

et al. 2015

Braz. oral res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dentin hypersensitivity can be defined as a temporary pain or exaggerated response from the exposed dentin to chemical, tactile, thermal or osmotic stimuli in the buccal environment, which would not normally occur in a healthy tooth (1). Under normal conditions, dentin is covered by enamel or cement and does not suffer direct stimulation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been reported that 8 to 30% of adults are affected by dentin hypersensitivity (8,9). Moreover, with more teeth being preserved and retained for longer periods, there will be an increasing demand by patients involved in this uncomfortable situation (1,10). Females have been reported to have a higher incidence of hypersensitivity than males, although the difference is not statistically significant, and the greatest incidence has been documented in the 20 to 40 year-old group (8).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with desensitizing agents: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two desensitizing agents in the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity in a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial. Seventy-seven teeth from 13 patients that presented some degree of sensitivity to probing and/ or air stimulation were treated with one of the following desensitizing agents: Oxa-Gel (G1), Sensi Kill (G2) and placebo gel (G3 -control). According to paired t-test, all treatments, even the placebo gel, were capable of reducing sensitivity scores for both stimuli.Analysis of data by ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed that the sensitivity scores were significantly lower only for Sensi Kill in comparison to the other products (Oxa-Gel and placebo), when air stimulus was applied. It may be concluded that treatment with Sensi Kill presented a slightly better performance in reducing dentin hypersensitivity when compared to the other desensitizing agent.

show abstract

“…Vários são os termos para denominar a manifestação sensorial da dentina, porém, não há uma terminologia universalmente aceita que a defina corretamente 62 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Avaliação da hiperestesia dentinária após tratamento em diferentes formulações à base de oxalato de potássio utilizando-se um placebo como controle.

Martineli¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dentine hypersensitivity—Into the 21st century

Cited by 42 publications

References 0 publications

Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions – a single-blind, split-mouth study

Dentin hypersensitivity treatment of non-carious cervical lesions – a single-blind, split-mouth study

Dentin hypersensitivity after treatment with desensitizing agents: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth clinical trial

Avaliação da hiperestesia dentinária após tratamento em diferentes formulações à base de oxalato de potássio utilizando-se um placebo como controle.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About