Dentine hypersensitivity: a randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled study of the efficacy of a fluoride‐sensitive teeth mouthrinse

Yates, R. J.; Newcombe, R. G.; Addy, M.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00581.x

Cited by 49 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Other clinical studies, 16,17 on the other hand, reported good DH treatment effects of using fluoride. Fluoride appears to be a subject of some debate with regard to the mechanism and effect of DH treatment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by Desensitizing Agents: A Real-time Measurement of Dentinal Fluid Flow Rate and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Kim

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Light-curing adhesive and oxalate-type desensitizing agents exhibited better reduction of dentinal fluid flow rate than did protein-precipitation and fluoride-type desensitizing agents based on measurements by a new fluid flow measuring device of subnanoliter scale. SUMMARYThe aims of this study were to examine changes in dentinal fluid flow (DFF) during the application of a desensitizing agent and to compare the permeability reduction levels among different types of desensitizing agents.A cervical cavity was prepared for the exposure of cervical dentin on an extracted human premolar connected to a subnanoliter fluid flow measuring device under 20 cm of water pressure. The cavity was acid-etched with 32% phosphoric acid to make dentin highly permeable. The different types of desensitizing agents that were applied on the cavity were Seal&Protect as the light-curing adhesive type, SuperSeal and BisBlock as oxalate types,

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by Desensitizing Agents: A Real-time Measurement of Dentinal Fluid Flow Rate and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Kim

et al. 2013

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…28,30 Because it is an unstable compound, CaF 2 rapidly dissociates after applica-tion, so that the anti-hyperesthesia effect is of short duration. In spite of fluoride being recognized as an effective anti-caries agent, its use as a desensitizing agent is still reported as unsuccessful when compared to therapeutic agents such as Gluma or Seal& Protect, despite its distinct modes of action.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6,8,12,20,30 Because it is a painful and subjective phenomenon, the pain from the cervical lesion may be modified by the subject's emotional components. 23,24 Taking into consideration the effectiveness of the agents used, it is observed that each agent has advantages and disadvantages, in relation to cost and time consumption.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare different treatments for dentin hypersensitivity in a 6-month follow-up. One hundred and one teeth exhibiting non carious cervical lesions were selected. The assessment method used to quantify sensitivity was the cold air syringe, recorded by the visual analogue scale (VAS), prior to treatment (baseline), immediately after topical treatment, after 1 week, 1, 3 and 6 months. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 20): G1: Gluma Desensitizer (GD); G2: Seal&Protect (SP); G3: Oxa-gel (OG); G4: Fluoride (F); G5: Low intensity laser-LILT (660 nm/3.8 J/cm²/15 mW). Analysis was based on the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test that demonstrated statistical differences immediately after the treatment (p = 0.0165). To observe the individual effects of each treatment, data was submitted to Friedman test. It was observed that GD and SP showed immediate effect after application. Reduction in the pain level throughout the six-month follow-up was also observed. In contrast, LILT presented a gradual reduction of hypersensitivity. OG and F showed effects as of the first and third month respectively. It can be concluded that, after the 6-month clinical evaluation, all therapies showed lower VAS sensitivity values compared with baseline, independently of their different modes of action.

show abstract

“…Iontophoresis with 2% sodium fluoride [15] Desensitizing toothpastes/dentifrices [13,14] containing strontium salts, fluorides, formaldehyde, potassium salts like potassium nitrate [16], potassium chloride or potassium citrate [17] Nova Min Mouthwashes containing potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride [18,19], potassium citrate or sodium fluoride [20] or a mixture of fluorides [21]. …”

Section: In-office Agents At-home Agentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chair Side Application of NovaMin for the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity- A Novel Technique

2014

JCDR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dentine hypersensitivity: a randomised, double‐blind placebo‐controlled study of the efficacy of a fluoride‐sensitive teeth mouthrinse

Abstract: The placebo response has again been shown to play a significant role in DH clinical trials and narrows the range over which to detect treatment differences. Study designs to minimise or prevent the placebo response in DH seem worthy of consideration.

Cited by 49 publications

References 22 publications

The Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by Desensitizing Agents: A Real-time Measurement of Dentinal Fluid Flow Rate and Scanning Electron Microscopy

The Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Occlusion by Desensitizing Agents: A Real-time Measurement of Dentinal Fluid Flow Rate and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Clinical evaluation of desensitizing treatments for cervical dentin hypersensitivity

Chair Side Application of NovaMin for the Treatment of Dentinal Hypersensitivity- A Novel Technique

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About