“…Geographic information systems‐tools consider tooth surfaces analogous to three‐dimensional landscapes (Hunter & Jernvall, ; Reed, ; Ungar & Williamson, ; Zucotti, Williamson, Limp, & Ungar, ), allowing measurements from the whole occlusal surface, making it independent of landmarks, unlike geometric morphometrics (Ungar & Williamson, ; Evans, ). Most GIS‐based dental topography studies to date have been focused on primates (Boyer, ; Bunn & Ungar, ; Dennis, Ungar, Teaford, & Glander, ; M'Kirera & Ungar, ; Pampush et al, ; Ungar, Healy, Karme, Teaford, & Fortelius, ; Ungar & M'Kirera, ; Winchester et al, ; Yamashita et al, ). However, orientation patch count (OPC, and orientation patch count rotated [OPCR]) analysis, which is based on geographical orientation of patches on the tooth surface, has also been applied to other animal groups (Evans & Janis, ; Evans & Jernvall, ; Evans, Wilson, Fortelius, & Jernvall, ; Santana, Strait, & Dumont, ; Smits & Evans, ; Wilson et al, ).…”