Dental prosthesis in the dog

McLaren, WP

doi:10.1136/vr.84.1.23-a

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since then there have been several reports of prosthetic-m€tal crowns, most being case reports with no follow-up or long-term evaluation.I9, 22,24,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] In a young Boxer with enamel hlpoplasia, four crowns were placed. No guidelines have been agreed upon in the recent litera[rrre.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Effectiveness of Adhesively-Bonded Metal Crowns on Damaged Canine Teeth of Working Dogs over a Two- to 52-Month Period

Foreest

Roeters

1998

J Vet Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this clinical study, 41 metal full crown restorations of canine teeth were placed in 18 working dogs. Twenty-six canine teeth had severe attrition with no involvement of the pulp cavities; 15 fractured canine teeth were endodontically treated. With the exception of one tooth, at least one-third of the coronal part of each canine tooth was available for a supragingivally performed, minimal tooth crown preparation. A dental resin luting cement technique was used to bond the electrolytically etched crown (made from an alloy of cobalt-chrome-molybdenum) to the tooth. The metal crowns were slightly shorter and with a more rounded tip than the original tooth. Posts or post-and-core techniques were not used. Median follow-up period was 30 months (range 2 to 61 months), at which time 36 crowns were found to be intact and functional. Five crowns were lost; three as a result of subsequent injury and fracture of the tooth below the crown; one as a result of use of less than one-third of the coronal portion of the tooth for retention of the crown; and one as a result of an oblique fracture of the root.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Effectiveness of Adhesively-Bonded Metal Crowns on Damaged Canine Teeth of Working Dogs over a Two- to 52-Month Period

Foreest

Roeters

1998

J Vet Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Long‐term success rate of resin‐bonded metal crowns on the canine teeth of working dogs

Foreest

Roeters

1997

Veterinary Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYIn this clinical study, 19 full metal crown restorations of canine teeth were placed in seven working dogs. Thirteen canine teeth were severely abraded with no involvement of the pulp cavities; six fractured canine teeth were endodontically treated. At least 1/3 of the coronal part of the canine tooth was available for a supragingivally performed, minimal tooth crown preparation. An adhesive technique to bond the electrolytically etched crown (an alloy of cobalt-chrome-molybdenum) to the tooth was used. The metal crowns, slightly shorter and with a rounder tip than the original tooth, were bonded to the enamel and dentine by using a resin luting cement. Posts or postand-core techniques were not used. Mean follow-up period was 32 months (range 24 -52 months), at which stage 17 crowns were found to be intact and functional. Two crowns were lost as a result of trauma resulting in a fracture of the tooth below the crown.

show abstract

Dental prosthesis in the dog

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Effectiveness of Adhesively-Bonded Metal Crowns on Damaged Canine Teeth of Working Dogs over a Two- to 52-Month Period

Evaluation of the Clinical Performance and Effectiveness of Adhesively-Bonded Metal Crowns on Damaged Canine Teeth of Working Dogs over a Two- to 52-Month Period

Long‐term success rate of resin‐bonded metal crowns on the canine teeth of working dogs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About