Dental Implants in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Cross‐Sectional Study

López‐Jornet, Pía; Camacho-Alonso, Fabio; Sánchez‐Siles, Mariano

doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00455.x

Cited by 31 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(46 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results indicated that the presence of OLP was not associated with a higher prevalence of peri‐implant mucositis . These results were confirmed in a cross‐sectional study failing to report significant differences in the prevalence of peri‐implant mucositis in patients with dental implants and diagnosed with or without OLP . However, in patients diagnosed with OLP and gingival desquamation, a significantly higher prevalence of peri‐implant mucositis was observed .…”

Section: Similarities and Differences Between Risk Indicators/factorssupporting

confidence: 54%

Peri‐implant mucositis

Heitz‐Mayfield

Salvi

2018

J Clinic Periodontology

235

259

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peri-implant mucositis is caused by biofilm accumulation which disrupts the host-microbe homeostasis at the implant-mucosa interface, resulting in an inflammatory lesion. Peri-implant mucositis is a reversible condition at the host biomarker level. Therefore, the clinical implication is that optimal biofilm removal is a prerequisite for the prevention and management of peri-implant mucositis. An understanding of peri-implant mucositis is important because it is considered a precursor for peri-implantitis.

show abstract

Section: Similarities and Differences Between Risk Indicators/factorssupporting

confidence: 54%

Peri‐implant mucositis

Heitz‐Mayfield

Salvi

2018

J Clinic Periodontology

235

259

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In total 16 prospective studies [14,18,19,28,35-40,44,45,47,48,50,53] from which 5 were controlled clinical trials [38-40,44,48] and 1 cross-sectional study [45], 23 retrospective studies [15-17,20,23-27,29-34,41-43,46,49,51,52,54] and two case series studies [21,22] were included in present research.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Implant survival and success rate was 100% vs. 96.8% in the control group [44]. Two studies confirmed that implant placement didn’t influence OLP manifestation [45,46]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

Guobis¹,

Pacauskienė²,

Astramskaitė

2016

JOMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo systematically review the influence of systemic diseases or medications used in their treatment on the dental implant therapy success.Material and MethodsThe search strategy was implemented on the National Library of Medicine database (MEDLINE) (Ovid) and EMBASE electronic databases between January 2006 and January 2016. Human studies with available English articles analysing the relationship between dental implant therapy success and systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, AIDS/HIV, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, Crohn’s disease, cardiovascular diseases, scleroderma, Sjögren’s syndrome, lichen planus, ectodermal dysplasia, post-transplantation status, were included in present review according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO system with the code CRD42016033662.ResultsPresent review included forty one retrospective and prospective follow-up studies, case-control studies, case report series and cohort studies. Despite some limitations this study reveals positive results of implantation in most systemic conditions that should be interpreted with caution. Influence of cardiovascular diseases on the dental implantation success should be explored deeply, because of controversial results and likelihood of comorbidity expressed by a history of cardiovascular diseases and periodontitis. There is only a weak relationship with bone density in osteoporosis and implant failure. All the other diseases did not show significant effect on implantation success.ConclusionsRecent studies with low strength of evidence and controversy show that systemic diseases may have potential effect on the success of implantation, but further detailed studies are needed to provide these findings.

show abstract

“…Most studies were single case reports or case series. Three controlled studies – one prospective the others retrospective – were found.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental implants in patients with oral mucosal diseases – a systematic review

Reichart

Schmidt-Westhausen

Khongkhunthian

et al. 2015

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To reveal dental implants survival rates in patients with oral mucosal diseases: oral lichen planus (OLP), Sjögren's syndrome (SjS), epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). A systematic literature search using PubMed/Medline and Embase databases, utilising MeSH and search term combinations identified publications on clinical use implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with OLP, SjS, EB, SSc reporting on study design, number, gender and age of patients, follow-up period exceeding 12 months, implant survival rate, published in English between 1980 and May 2015. After a mean observation period (mOP) of 53·9 months (standard deviation [SD] ±18·3), 191 implants in 57 patients with OLP showed a survival rate (SR) of 95·3% (SD ±21·2). For 17 patients with SjS (121 implants, mOP 48·6 ± 28·7 months), 28 patients with EB (165 implants, mOP 38·3 ± 16·9 months) and five patients with SSc (38 implants, mOP 38·3 ± 16·9 months), the respective SR was 91·7 ± 5·97% (SjS), 98·5 ± 2·7% (EB) and 97·4 ± 4·8% (SSc). Heterogeneity of data structure and quality of reporting outcomes did not allow for further comparative data analysis. For implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients suffering from OLP, SjS, EB and SSc, no evidence-based treatment guidelines are presently available. However, no strict contraindication for the placement of implants seems to be justified in patients with OLP, SjS, EB nor SSc. Implant survival rates are comparable to those of patients without oral mucosal diseases. Treatment guidelines as for dental implantation in patients with healthy oral mucosa should be followed.

show abstract

Dental Implants in Patients with Oral Lichen Planus: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Abstract: The results of the present study suggest that implants do not influence manifestations of OLP. OLP is not a risk factor for peri-implantitis.

Cited by 31 publications

References 26 publications

Peri‐implant mucositis

Peri‐implant mucositis

General Diseases Influence on Peri-Implantitis Development: a Systematic Review

Dental implants in patients with oral mucosal diseases – a systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About