2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Disease Outcomes Following a 2-Year Oral Health Promotion Program for Australian Aboriginal Children and Their Families: A 2-Arm Parallel, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract: Background Dental disease has far-reaching impacts on child health and wellbeing. We worked with Aboriginal Australian communities to develop a multifaceted oral health promotion initiative to reduce children's experience of dental disease at age 2 years. Methods This was a single-blind, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial. Participants were recruited from health service providers across South Australia. Women pregnant with an Aboriginal child were eligible. The i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recruitment was mainly through the antenatal clinics at South Australian hospitals and through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organizations. The study was a 2-arm parallel, outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial that aimed to assess if an intervention involving dental care to mothers during pregnancy, application of fluoride varnish to the teeth of children, anticipatory guidance, and motivational interviewing reduced prevalence of dental disease among Aboriginal children in South Australia at follow-up ages of 24 and 36 months [9,10]. The intervention took place during pregnancy and when children were aged 6, 12, and 18 months for the early intervention group, and when children were aged 24, 30, and 36 months for the delayed intervention group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruitment was mainly through the antenatal clinics at South Australian hospitals and through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organizations. The study was a 2-arm parallel, outcome assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial that aimed to assess if an intervention involving dental care to mothers during pregnancy, application of fluoride varnish to the teeth of children, anticipatory guidance, and motivational interviewing reduced prevalence of dental disease among Aboriginal children in South Australia at follow-up ages of 24 and 36 months [9,10]. The intervention took place during pregnancy and when children were aged 6, 12, and 18 months for the early intervention group, and when children were aged 24, 30, and 36 months for the delayed intervention group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community programmes for managing ECC generally target high‐risk, low socioeconomic, disadvantaged communities using established caries prevention methods. Programmes that are culturally competent with community‐based participation and alignment with community cultures have been successful in reducing ECC in indigenous, low‐income, and migrant communities worldwide . Similarly, personal approaches such as home visiting and telephone contacts can reduce ECC by increasing caregivers’ health literacy and self‐efficacy to change behaviours to improve their infants’ oral health .…”
Section: Community Management Of Eccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programmes that are culturally competent with community-based participation and alignment with community cultures have been successful in reducing ECC in indigenous, low-income, and migrant communities worldwide. [44][45][46][47] Similarly, personal approaches such as home visiting and telephone contacts can reduce ECC by increasing caregivers' health literacy and self-efficacy to change behaviours to improve their infants' oral health. [48][49][50] Knowledge increases, however, may not improve oral health behaviours or reduce caries increment.…”
Section: Of Eccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trial proved to be efficacious, with children in the immediate intervention group having less untreated dental caries than children in the delayed intervention group at follow-up conducted at 2 and 3 years of age. 11,12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%