2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/ifsa-nafips.2013.6608417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental classification for periapical radiograph based on multiple fuzzy attribute

Abstract: Dental classification for periapical radiograph based on multiple fuzzy attribute is proposed, where each tooth is analyzed based on multiple criteria such as area/perimeter ratio and width/height ratio. A classification method on special type of dental image called periapical radiograph is studied and classification is done without speculative classification (in case of ambiguous object), therefore an accurate and assistive result can be obtained due to its capability to handle ambiguous tooth. Experiment res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results comparison was performed against different caries detection diagnostic methods to determine if the results fell within acceptable limits or not. The caries detection diagnostic methods compared against include textural classification as discussed by [21], dental classification for periapical radiographs by [22] and caries detection through a supervised learning model proposed by [23] for panoramic images. The comparison of our proposed method with other detection techniques is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results comparison was performed against different caries detection diagnostic methods to determine if the results fell within acceptable limits or not. The caries detection diagnostic methods compared against include textural classification as discussed by [21], dental classification for periapical radiographs by [22] and caries detection through a supervised learning model proposed by [23] for panoramic images. The comparison of our proposed method with other detection techniques is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caries detection in panoramic images [23] 1392 98.0% Dental classification for periapical images [22] 78 82.5% Textural classification of digital images [21] 64 96.88% PaxNet [11] 470 86.05% ICDAS [12] 620 92.37% GLCM [13] 240 80% Deep learning [16] 304 64.14% Proposed approach 11,114 97.0%…”
Section: Dataset Images Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic tooth segmentation based on radiographic data is very challenging due to noise, low contrast, uneven illumination, the complexity of the object topology in the image, random tooth orientation, and the absence of a clear line of demarcation between the tooth and other tissues [7]. Dental X-ray image segmentation falls under machine learning theory, as application of a clustering technique that groups similar values into one group and different values into different groups [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCM determines tooth status by cyclic updating membership values and prototypes until stable. Tangel, Fatichah [7] presented a fuzzy inference system to achieve four categories of dental images. This system used Mamdani type FIS with centroid defuzzification method which employed multiple fuzzy attributes and the selected threshold is 0.15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%