2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-6285-0_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Cavity Detection Using YOLO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many dental researchers have transitioned to YOLO-based object detection, to automate carious lesion detection. Sonavane et al found YOLO to successfully classify carious lesions at 87% accuracy, when the threshold for positivity was leniently set at a cutoff value of 0.3 [ 37 ]. The current study stressed the models further, by setting a cutoff value at 0.5, ensuring higher scrutiny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many dental researchers have transitioned to YOLO-based object detection, to automate carious lesion detection. Sonavane et al found YOLO to successfully classify carious lesions at 87% accuracy, when the threshold for positivity was leniently set at a cutoff value of 0.3 [ 37 ]. The current study stressed the models further, by setting a cutoff value at 0.5, ensuring higher scrutiny.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%