2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental Caries Prevalence and Experience (ICDAS II Criteria) of 5-, 12- and 15-Year-Old Children and Adolescents with an Immigrant Background in Greece, Compared with the Host Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract: Evidence regarding disparities in oral health among native and immigrant child and adolescent populations in Europe is scarce. The present study aimed to determine the caries status of 5-, 12-, and 15-year-olds with an immigrant background in Greece in relation to their sociodemographic characteristics and compare their caries levels with those of their native Greek peers. A sample of 707 immigrants underwent clinical examination for caries (ICDAS II criteria), followed by a calculation of caries prevalence an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the caries level of the 12-year-old age group is recommended by the WHO to assess the dental caries status of school-age children (17), many countries and regions have focused on the caries level of children aged 12 (18)(19)(20)(21). However, the FPM, which many parents often ignore, can decay in the first 2-3 years after the eruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the caries level of the 12-year-old age group is recommended by the WHO to assess the dental caries status of school-age children (17), many countries and regions have focused on the caries level of children aged 12 (18)(19)(20)(21). However, the FPM, which many parents often ignore, can decay in the first 2-3 years after the eruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances were excluded. The sample size was calculated using G*power, assuming that 50% of the patients (to yield the largest sample size) fell within the range of the average dental health status (of the paediatric population in Greece) 18 . At a power of 80%, the effect size at 0.5 and α = 0.05, the sample needed was estimated at 94 children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preventive protocol and procedure and ECC are among the topics of greatest interest in pediatric dentistry research [ 14 ]. From a first survey of the current literature, it was clear that the studies that investigated the knowledge of oral hygiene in pediatric dentistry were very heterogeneous, as they adopt very different protocols and samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%