2017
DOI: 10.2319/071917-482.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental anomalies in different growth and skeletal malocclusion patterns

Abstract: The results of this study support the idea that DA are preferentially associated with certain patterns of malocclusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
34
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(64 reference statements)
8
34
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,9,11,12,13 It was observed that individuals with skeletal discrepancies (Class II and III) had more dental anomalies when compared to individuals with no skeletal discrepancies (Class I). 1,9,12,13 The same was observed for dental anomalies of number, 1,12,13 shape, and position. 10 Three studies only made the diagnosis of tooth agenesis 11,13 and/or third molar agenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1,9,11,12,13 It was observed that individuals with skeletal discrepancies (Class II and III) had more dental anomalies when compared to individuals with no skeletal discrepancies (Class I). 1,9,12,13 The same was observed for dental anomalies of number, 1,12,13 shape, and position. 10 Three studies only made the diagnosis of tooth agenesis 11,13 and/or third molar agenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 It appears that dental anomalies may be more likely to occur if individuals have Class II or Class III relationships in comparison to Class I. 9 This sophisticated clinical definition is a base for phenotype-genotype correlation, that may contribute to more accurate treatment predictions and to genetic studies. 9 This systematic review aimed to confirm that evidence exists that individuals with Class I skeletal malocclusion are less likely to have dental anomalies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This association of dental anomalies suggests some genetic involvement in the postnatal growth of facial structures, affecting both the craniofacial and occlusal relationship and dental development. 18 The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully set for this study. Patients as young as 8 years were included, as this age was suggested by Ngan et al 4 to investigate for ectopic canines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the prevalence, distribution, and sexual dimorphism of dental anomalies among different skeletal malocclusions and growth patterns were investigated, and tooth agenesis and microdontia were significantly more common in class III and hyperdivergent patients. 18 The presence of dental anomalies (transposition), 19 lateral agenesis, peg-shaped lateral incisors, 20 aplasia of the second premolar, infraocclusion of primary molars, enamel hypoplasia, and ectopic eruption of the first permanent molars 21 associated with impacted canines is evident in the literature. [19][20][21][22][23] Several studies have investigated impacted/ectopic maxillary canines, but mandibular canines were not examined; the prevalence of ectopic mandibular canines was reported to be 1.16% in the Indian population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who belong to lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be associated with impaired OHrQoL (Foster et al, 2013). Impoverished children belonging to lower socioeconomic status may experience malocclusion (imperfect positioning of teeth), as they experience growth in the upper and lower jaw (Fernandez et al, 2018). Their problems are more likely to remain untreated due to the high cost of orthodontic treatment required for their malocclusion (Foster et al, 2013).…”
Section: Oral Health-related Quality Of Life (Ohrqol)mentioning
confidence: 99%