2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental and phylogeographic patterns of variation in gorillas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This should result in relatively low measures of dissimilarity within each species sample. As a consequence, dissimilarity values for pairs of crania belonging to different species are more likely to be outside the range of conspecific values than if species samples had included more variation (as might result from the inclusion of multiple subspecies, e.g., Pilbrow, 2006Pilbrow, , 2010. Stated in the framework of hypothesis testing used by the proponents of these methods (ignoring for the moment whether such a framework is justified on theoretical grounds), the sample has been selected to minimize variation within species and thus minimize the occurrence of Type II error; i.e., failure to reject the null hypothesis that two crania belong to the same species when in fact they belong to two different species.…”
Section: Does Shape Similarity Imply Conspecificity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should result in relatively low measures of dissimilarity within each species sample. As a consequence, dissimilarity values for pairs of crania belonging to different species are more likely to be outside the range of conspecific values than if species samples had included more variation (as might result from the inclusion of multiple subspecies, e.g., Pilbrow, 2006Pilbrow, , 2010. Stated in the framework of hypothesis testing used by the proponents of these methods (ignoring for the moment whether such a framework is justified on theoretical grounds), the sample has been selected to minimize variation within species and thus minimize the occurrence of Type II error; i.e., failure to reject the null hypothesis that two crania belong to the same species when in fact they belong to two different species.…”
Section: Does Shape Similarity Imply Conspecificity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population substructure is often attributed to an isolation by distance effect, and this has been proposed in the case of western lowland gorillas [9], but alternative causes have also been suggested [4]. For example, a recent study of gorilla dental data found that gorilla population structure correlates more significantly with altitudinal variation than with geographic distance, suggesting that isolation by distance may not provide a complete explanation for population dispersal patterns in gorillas [2].…”
Section: Gorilla Demographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two species of gorilla are currently recognized, based on morphology and geographical distribution within equatorial Africa: western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla), in tropical forest north of the Congo river on the west side of the continent, and eastern gorillas (Gorilla beringei) ~1000 km to the east, extending to the slopes of the central African mountains [1,2]. Estimates of when the two species diverged have varied, but recent calculations based on genomic data suggest an initial divergence time of at least 500,000 years ago [3] with gene flow continuing until as recently as 80,000 years ago [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), grauer gorillas have puzzled researchers with regard to their evolutionary relationships and their morphological, functional, and behavioral affinities. Originally considered true mountain gorillas (Coolidge, ; Schultz, ), subsequent work focused on increasing knowledge about grauer gorillas, often highlighting similarities and/or differences to both mountain and western gorillas (Groves, ; Groves and Stott, ; Yamagiwa et al, ; Yamagiwa and Mwanza, ; Uchida, ; Doran and McNeilage, ; Taylor, ; Taylor and Groves, ; Yamagiwa et al, ; Jabbour, ; Pilbrow, ; Tocheri et al, ; Dunn et al, ; Knigge et al, ). Here we combine an overview of the current state of knowledge about grauer gorillas from genetic, morphological, and paleoenvironmental perspectives, with new evidence of two rare skeletal traits present in the hands and feet of eastern gorillas to articulate a founder‐effects hypothesis for the evolutionary origin and population history of the grauer gorilla.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%