Dental age estimation on Bosnian–Herzegovinian children aged 6–14 years: Evaluation of Chaillet's international maturity standards

Galić, Ivan; Vodanović, Marin; Janković, Stipan; Mihanović, Frane; Nakaš, Enita; Prohić, Samir; Galić, Elizabeta; Brkić, Hrvoje

doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2012.04.037

Cited by 42 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The age overestimation calculated by CHA 12 in males in the present study was lower than that verified in Spanish 2 and Bosnian males, 25 in contrast to the age underestimation reported in Korean 13 and French 7 males. In females, age underestimation was lower than that observed in Korean 13 and French subjects, 7 unlike the results observed in a sample of Spanish origin, 2 as well as in Bosnian 25 and French 7 girls, in which the method overestimated age. Concerning other Venezuelans, the findings in a sample from the Andean region 2 agree with the age underestimation in the females of the present study, and differ with that of males, in whom age was overestimated by the method (Table 4).…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 85%

“…22 In Venezuelans, age overestimation has been found in samples originating in the center and the west of the country 3,23,24 and underestimation in subjects from the Andean region. 2 With respect to Chaillet et al, 12 age overestimation has been seen in Bosnian 25 and Spanish 2 individuals, as well as underestimation in Koreans 13 and French subjects. 7 Consequently, the objective of this study was to assess the applicability of the methods of Demirjian et al 1 in its revised version 11 (DEM) and Chaillet et al (CHA) 12 in a sample of Venezuelan children and adolescents of both sexes from Maracaibo, Zulia, in the estimation of the DA.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 77%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Aplicabilidad De Los Métodos De Demirjian Y Chaillet en La Estimación De La Edad Dental De Niños Del Estado Zulia, Venezuela

Ortega-Pertuz

Espina-Fereira

Fereira

2018

Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: la edad dental (ED) es empleada en disciplinas clínicas para evaluar si el individuo se encuentra avanzado o atrasado en su desarrollo dentario, o bien para asignar la edad de sujetos vivos o fallecidos sin documentos válidos de identificación, y es de utilidad en la práctica forense. Objetivo: estudiar la aplicabilidad de los métodos de Demirjian et al revisado (1976) y Chaillet et al en la estimación de la ED en una muestra de niños y adolescentes venezolanos. Métodos: se realizó un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y de campo; para ello se analizaron 516 radiografías panorámicas de pacientes de ambos sexos con edades cronológicas entre 6 y 18 años. El desarrollo dental fue evaluado en los siete dientes inferiores izquierdos mediante los estadios de maduración propuestos en el método de Demirjian et al, mientras que el cálculo de la ED fue realizado de acuerdo a las tablas de referencia proporcionadas por cada método. Se obtuvieron estadísticas descriptivas, así como diferencias de media entre la edad cronológica (EC) y la ED estimada mediante un test de Student. Resultados: se observó sobreestimación de la edad por el método de Demirjian hasta los 15 años de edad, así como subestimación de la edad con el método de Chaillet. Considerando el total de la muestra, ambos métodos subestimaron la edad (Demirjian 0,20 ± 1,46; Chaillet 0,34 ± 1,39), y la diferencia entre EC y ED fue significativa (Demirjian p = 0,0002; Chaillet p = 0,000). Conclusiones: ambos métodos pueden ser empleados en la muestra estudiada, teniendo en cuenta que la ED debe ser valorada en conjunto con otros indicadores de maduración para la evaluación del desarrollo del individuo.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 85%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Aplicabilidad De Los Métodos De Demirjian Y Chaillet en La Estimación De La Edad Dental De Niños Del Estado Zulia, Venezuela

Ortega-Pertuz

Espina-Fereira

Fereira

2018

Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most of the previous studies estimated dental age in general population without taking account of the possible effect of skeletal pattern on the dental development stage [16, 25, 30, 31]. However, one study by Celikoglu et al [30] evaluated Demirjian dental age in patients with and without skeletal malocclusions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Age in Orthodontic Patients with Different Skeletal Patterns

Lauc

Nakaš

Latić-Dautović

et al. 2017

BioMed Research International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To evaluate the difference between chronological and dental age, calculated by Willems and Cameriere methods, in various skeletal patterns according to Steiner's ANB Classification. Methods. This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised the sample of 776 participants aged between 7 and 15 years (368 males and 408 females). For each participant, panoramic images (OPT) and laterolateral cephalograms (LC) were collected from the medical database. On LC ANB angle was measured; on OPT dental age (DA) was calculated while chronological age (CA) and sex were recorded. The sample was divided into three subgroups (Class I, Class II, and Class III) with similar distribution based on the chronological age and ANB angle. CA was calculated as the difference between the date of OPT imaging and the date of birth, while DA was evaluated using Willems and Cameriere methods. ANB angle was measured on LC by two independent investigators using the cephalometric software. Differences between sexes and the difference between dental and chronological age were tested by independent and paired samples t-test, respectively; one-way ANOVA was used to test differences among ANB classes with Tukey post hoc test to compare specific pairs of ANB classes. Results. The significant difference was found between Class III and other two skeletal classes in males using both dental age estimation methods. In Class III males dental age was ahead averagely by 0.41 years when using Willems method, while Cameriere method overestimated CA for 0.22 years. Conclusion. In males with Class III skeletal pattern, dental development is faster than in Classes I and II skeletal pattern. This faster development is not present in females.

show abstract

“…The development of permanent dentition, except third molars, can last up to 15 years of age, so it is important to recognize this pattern for timely treatment and particularly for the management of severe cases [8]. Dental methods for age calculation on developing teeth are important in the estimation of chronological age in cases of unknown date of birth, adoption of children, asylum seeking procedures, unaccompanied children, or estimating age from skeletal remains [9, 10]. Garn et al [11] first reported a pattern of delayed dental development in children with CMPT.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Age and Tooth Development in Orthodontic Patients with Agenesis of Permanent Teeth

Badrov

Lauc

Nakaš

et al. 2017

BioMed Research International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To compare the development of permanent teeth in a group of children with the congenitally missing permanent teeth (CMPT) and corresponding nonaffected group. Methods. The formation stages of all developing permanent teeth were determined on 345 panoramic radiographs (OPTs) by the method of Haavikko (1970), and dental age was calculated. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the differences between dental age (DA) and chronological age (CA) in those with CMPT and those not affected. Spearman test was used to evaluate the correlation between DA-CA and the number of missing teeth. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the development of the teeth adjacent to the place of the agenesis with matched pair in corresponding nonaffected group. Results. Dental age was significantly delayed in CMPT children compared to the nonaffected group (p < 0.001). The mean differences were −0.57 ± 1.20 years and −0.61 ± 1.23 years in males and females, without difference between sexes (p = 0.763). The number of missing teeth affected the delay only in females (p = 0.024). Only mesial teeth in females were significantly delayed in development when compared to the nonaffected group (p = 0.007). Conclusion. Our findings show that the development of the permanent teeth is delayed when compared to the nonaffected group of the same sex and age.

show abstract

Dental age estimation on Bosnian–Herzegovinian children aged 6–14 years: Evaluation of Chaillet's international maturity standards

Cited by 42 publications

References 19 publications

Aplicabilidad De Los Métodos De Demirjian Y Chaillet en La Estimación De La Edad Dental De Niños Del Estado Zulia, Venezuela

Aplicabilidad De Los Métodos De Demirjian Y Chaillet en La Estimación De La Edad Dental De Niños Del Estado Zulia, Venezuela

Dental Age in Orthodontic Patients with Different Skeletal Patterns

Dental Age and Tooth Development in Orthodontic Patients with Agenesis of Permanent Teeth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About