2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental age assessment in 7–14-year-old Chinese children: Comparison of Demirjian and Willems methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In considering the total number of individuals, age calculated by both methods was underestimated; however, when assessing a subsample of the group up to 15 years of age using the 1.25 to 3.18 years ratio CA-DA difference found in older groups, there was an overestimation of age calculated by DEM 11 in both sexes, as reported in previous studies 2, 5, 7, 13, 15-17, 19, 20 using the revised version of the method. The values of the CA-DA difference in this study are higher than those observed in Korean, 13 Iranian, 5 and Tunisian 15 males, lower than those reported in Australian, 14 Spanish, 2 Chinese, 20 French, 7 Turk, 16 and Yugoslav 19 males, as well as in Iranian 5 and Tunisian females, 15 and similar to those found by Abesi et al 18 in another sample of Iranian origin. Table 4 shows the difference in values between CA and estimated DA found in the aforementioned studies, enabling a comparison with those obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In considering the total number of individuals, age calculated by both methods was underestimated; however, when assessing a subsample of the group up to 15 years of age using the 1.25 to 3.18 years ratio CA-DA difference found in older groups, there was an overestimation of age calculated by DEM 11 in both sexes, as reported in previous studies 2, 5, 7, 13, 15-17, 19, 20 using the revised version of the method. The values of the CA-DA difference in this study are higher than those observed in Korean, 13 Iranian, 5 and Tunisian 15 males, lower than those reported in Australian, 14 Spanish, 2 Chinese, 20 French, 7 Turk, 16 and Yugoslav 19 males, as well as in Iranian 5 and Tunisian females, 15 and similar to those found by Abesi et al 18 in another sample of Iranian origin. Table 4 shows the difference in values between CA and estimated DA found in the aforementioned studies, enabling a comparison with those obtained in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…15 Regarding the method of Demirjian et al, 1,11 a consistent overestimation of age (CA-DA difference) has been found, with average values of -0.60 years in males (0.23 to -3.04) and -0.65 years in females (0.10 to -2.82 years), when used in individuals with ethnic and socioeconomic characteristics that differ to those of the sample used to standardize the method. 5,7,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Studies in Latin American subjects, particularly Argentinians, 6 Brazilians, 4 Chileans, 21 Paraguayans, 10 and Peruvians 9 have reported age overestimation, while a tendency to underestimation was observed in Colombian individuals. 22 In Venezuelans, age overestimation has been found in samples originating in the center and the west of the country 3,23,24 and underestimation in subjects from the Andean region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scope of dental age estimation, the previous study by Olze et al had reviewed various methods of dental development staging and found that the Demirjian method can define the chronological age accurately (Olze et al 2005). In spite of that statement, another study suggested that the modification of the Demirjian method proposed by Willems showed higher accuracy in estimating age and has been tested in various populations (Willems et al 2001(Willems et al , 2012Grover et al 2012;Ambarkova et al 2014;Ye et al 2014). The Willems method was considered to be applied in the Indonesian children population because of its accuracy, and there was no established dental age estimation method for Indonesian children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] The revised method was found to provide better age prediction performances, validated in and compared with different nationalities and ethnicities, if seven developing teeth are available. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] With recent world migration issues in mind, human age estimation is triggering interest of contemporary society, expressing the need for alternative documentation of the chronological age i.e. in case of unaccompanied minor fugitives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%