“…In considering the total number of individuals, age calculated by both methods was underestimated; however, when assessing a subsample of the group up to 15 years of age using the 1.25 to 3.18 years ratio CA-DA difference found in older groups, there was an overestimation of age calculated by DEM 11 in both sexes, as reported in previous studies 2, 5, 7, 13, 15-17, 19, 20 using the revised version of the method. The values of the CA-DA difference in this study are higher than those observed in Korean, 13 Iranian, 5 and Tunisian 15 males, lower than those reported in Australian, 14 Spanish, 2 Chinese, 20 French, 7 Turk, 16 and Yugoslav 19 males, as well as in Iranian 5 and Tunisian females, 15 and similar to those found by Abesi et al 18 in another sample of Iranian origin. Table 4 shows the difference in values between CA and estimated DA found in the aforementioned studies, enabling a comparison with those obtained in the present study.…”