2005
DOI: 10.1086/497288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density Wave Streaming Motions in Stars along the Sagittarius Spiral Arm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that Fresneau et al (2007) found no colour effect when deriving p.m. at the level of 0.002 yr −1 by comparing century-old astrographic observations and second-epoch Schmidt telescope ones used in the GSC 1.2 construction. While that result was based on Tycho-2 stars (Hog et al 2000) brighter than m b = 12 (Fresneau et al 2005), we presume it is valid for even fainter stars, and hence no severe systematic effect has been introduced into the data by our proper motion determinations. We see in Fig.…”
Section: Validity Of the Rpmd For Stellar Group Classification In Sogsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We note that Fresneau et al (2007) found no colour effect when deriving p.m. at the level of 0.002 yr −1 by comparing century-old astrographic observations and second-epoch Schmidt telescope ones used in the GSC 1.2 construction. While that result was based on Tycho-2 stars (Hog et al 2000) brighter than m b = 12 (Fresneau et al 2005), we presume it is valid for even fainter stars, and hence no severe systematic effect has been introduced into the data by our proper motion determinations. We see in Fig.…”
Section: Validity Of the Rpmd For Stellar Group Classification In Sogsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…These relations follow from the assumption that the mean dispersion of the transverse velocity of foreground stars observed along the direction of each 2 • × 2 • field of view is on the order of 45 km s −1 (Fresneau et al 2003). These relations between H b and M b are based on a different stellar sample (Fresneau et al 2005) One then finds a correlation between the statistically derived parallax π in 10 −3 arcsec and the p.m. total component μ in 10 −3 arcsec yr −1 -π = (0.072 ± 0.001)μ + (0.284 ± 0.005) -which is similar to the relation that was found using stars with measured trigonometric parallax π ≥ 10 −3 arcsec and p.m. μ ≥ 10 −2 arcsec yr −1 in the space-based Hipparcos survey of stars brighter than apparent magnitude 11 (Fresneau et al 2005 Table 9 of Chiu 1980), short-term apparent magnitude scatter σ 1 , long-term apparent magnitude scatter σ 2 , error in absolute magnitude determination due to the p.m. component error σ 3 = 2.17 Δμ μ , annual p.m. in arcsec in galactic longitude μ 1 and in galactic latitude μ 2 , derived parallax π in milliarcsec, and a correlation coefficient c, which has values from 0 to 1.0 and will be explained later in our study. We also give our adopted classification of the star as a Pop.…”
Section: Construction Of the Variability Sample Catalog (Vsc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shetty et al 2007), and observationally (e.g. Aalto et al 1999;Fresneau et al 2005;Riffel et al 2008;Meidt et al 2013). The cloud trapping is particularly important to the fact that clouds would rarely interact with arms more than once in a dynamical timescale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%