2015
DOI: 10.5194/sed-7-1941-2015
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density structure and geometry of the Costa Rican subduction zone from 3-D gravity modeling and local earthquake data

Abstract: Abstract. The eastern part of the oceanic Cocos Plate presents a heterogeneous crustal structure due to diverse origins and ages as well as plate-hot spot interactions which originated the Cocos Ridge, a structure that converges with the Caribbean Plate in southeastern Costa Rica. The complex structure of the oceanic plate directly influences the dynamics and geometry of the subduction zone along the Middle American Trench. In this paper an integrated interpretation of the slab geometry is presented based on t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottom: Transect of seismicity, RF results, and Cocos Plate slab top models. White circles are +3.0 magnitude earthquake events (Linkimer et al, 2018) and red circles are well-relocated earthquakes from Lücke and Arroyo (2015). Green and orange lines are slab tops from Slab2 (Hayes et al, 2018) and Lücke and Arroyo (2015).…”
Section: Receiver Function Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bottom: Transect of seismicity, RF results, and Cocos Plate slab top models. White circles are +3.0 magnitude earthquake events (Linkimer et al, 2018) and red circles are well-relocated earthquakes from Lücke and Arroyo (2015). Green and orange lines are slab tops from Slab2 (Hayes et al, 2018) and Lücke and Arroyo (2015).…”
Section: Receiver Function Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White circles are +3.0 magnitude earthquake events (Linkimer et al, 2018) and red circles are well-relocated earthquakes from Lücke and Arroyo (2015). Green and orange lines are slab tops from Slab2 (Hayes et al, 2018) and Lücke and Arroyo (2015). Black and gold circles show depths of boundaries.…”
Section: Receiver Function Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in recent decades suggest a possible relationship between the structure of the upper plate and the rupture process of megathrust earthquakes in subduction zones. Worldwide, reflection seismic studies (e.g., Bangs & Cande, 1997; Bangs et al., 2020; Geersen et al., 2018; Kodaira et al., 2012; Kopp et al., 2001; Ranero et al., 2006; Tsuji et al., 2013), tomographic inversion of seismic velocities (e.g., Contreras‐Reyes et al., 2012; Klingelhoefer et al., 2010; Martínez‐Loriente et al., 2019; Nakanishi et al., 2002; Sallarès et al., 2013), and density models (e.g., Fleming & Tréhu, 1999; Hackney et al., 2006; Lücke & Arroyo, 2015; Maksymowicz et al., 2015, 2018; Wang et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2020) show important variations (or segmentation) in the structure of the continental wedge, along the strike and dip direction of the subduction zone. This segmentation seems to control, at least partly, the rate and clustering of the seismicity and the rupture of large earthquakes, including heterogeneities of slip and the distribution of foreshocks and aftershocks (Contreras‐Reyes et al., 2010; Hicks et al., 2014; Maksymowicz et al., 2018; Moscoso et al., 2011; Tsuji et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%