2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-020-01401-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of wild felids in Sonora, Mexico: a comparison of spatially explicit capture-recapture methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides further evidence that the SPIM package can provide robust density estimates, comparable to conventional SCR methods, whilst improving precision for partial identity samples (Augustine et al ., 2018; Greenspan et al ., 2020). As SCR methods are widely used to inform conservation management, and partial identity is a common problem for researchers, any gain in precision should be of broad interest (Augustine et al ., 2018; Johansson et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study provides further evidence that the SPIM package can provide robust density estimates, comparable to conventional SCR methods, whilst improving precision for partial identity samples (Augustine et al ., 2018; Greenspan et al ., 2020). As SCR methods are widely used to inform conservation management, and partial identity is a common problem for researchers, any gain in precision should be of broad interest (Augustine et al ., 2018; Johansson et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential to survey a protected area using half the number of camera traps used in conventional designs is highly advantageous for protected area managers, the majority of whom have limited budgets (Mansourian & Dudley, 2008). The use of SPIM also allows a wider survey area to be used, when camera numbers are limited, resulting in a greater proportion of the population being sampled (Foster & Harmsen, 2012; Mohamed et al ., 2019; Greenspan et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It would be expected that if the differences in our predicted home range sizes across ecoregions are representative of jaguar spatial needs, there should be a general correlation between home range size with densities. 16 To test this, we compared density estimates from our study ecoregions [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] with mean estimates of home range size for our study ecoregions (Figure S1; Table S5), finding a correlation (r = À0.70) between smaller home range size and higher jaguar densities in productive systems such as the Pantanal, Llanos, and southwestern Amazon, and lower densities and larger home ranges in semi-arid ecoregions with lower productivity and forest cover, including the Caatinga, Cerrado, Sonoran-Sinaloan subtropical dry forest, and Dry Chaco.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Home Range Size and Movement Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jaguar ( Panthera onca ) is rare in Mexico and the USA (Jedrzejewski et al, 2018), and data are particularly sparse for populations in the northernmost extent of the species' distribution, where jaguar population densities are among the lowest in their range (Greenspan et al, 2020; Gutiérrez‐González et al, 2012; Jedrzejewski et al, 2018). Jaguars are classified as near threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN; Quigley et al, 2017); however, when evaluated individually, jaguar populations in every region except the Amazon would be classified as endangered or critically endangered according to IUCN listing criteria and methodology (de la Torre et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%