Proceedings of 34th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2016) 2017
DOI: 10.22323/1.256.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of states

Abstract: Although Monte Carlo calculations using Importance Sampling have matured into the most widely employed method for determining first principle results in QCD, they spectacularly fail for theories with a sign problem or for which certain rare configurations play an important role. Non-Markovian Random walks, based upon iterative refinements of the density-of-states, overcome such overlap problems. I will review the Linear Logarithmic Relaxation (LLR) method and, in particular, focus onto ergodicity and exponenti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First-principles studies of this regime are hindered by the sign problem: with chemical potential µ = 0 the euclidean action becomes complex, and can therefore not be used as a probability weight in Monte Carlo simulations, which are the mainstay of lattice gauge theory, the method of choice for first-principles, non-perturbative quantum field theory. Despite recent progress in alternative sampling approaches such as the density of states method [1], complex Langevin [2] and Lefschetz thimble and related approaches [3,4], we do not as yet have any method that has been shown to yield valid and reliable results for real QCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First-principles studies of this regime are hindered by the sign problem: with chemical potential µ = 0 the euclidean action becomes complex, and can therefore not be used as a probability weight in Monte Carlo simulations, which are the mainstay of lattice gauge theory, the method of choice for first-principles, non-perturbative quantum field theory. Despite recent progress in alternative sampling approaches such as the density of states method [1], complex Langevin [2] and Lefschetz thimble and related approaches [3,4], we do not as yet have any method that has been shown to yield valid and reliable results for real QCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods tested in the context of lattice gauge theories include e.g. Lefschetz thimbles [2,3], complex Langevin simulations [4,5] and density of states methods [6]. In this paper, we concentrate on the Hamiltonian approach in the framework of tensor networks (TN).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent years have seen remarkable advances for simulating those theories: Complexification of fields [14] gave rise to Complex Langevin simulations [15,16] or Lefschetz Thimble inspired methods [17]. Algorithmic advances [18] may generically give reliable results for medium size systems (e.g. [19,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%