2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90020-9_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of Ices of Astrophysical Interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. It can be observed, as in the results derived from Satorre et al (2018), that the Loeffler et al (2016) experimental values are lower than the theoretical values. Both sets of values decrease linearly from 15 to 60 K and appear to remain at a constant value up to 70 K. Another aspect to emphasize is that while the experimental measurements indicate a lack of porosity from 60 K, and possibly between 50 and 60 K, the theoretical measurements seem to indicate the presence of a minimum value for porosity, which is in agreement with the experimental results obtained via other methods (Schulze & Abe 1980).…”
Section: Comparison Of Emas and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6. It can be observed, as in the results derived from Satorre et al (2018), that the Loeffler et al (2016) experimental values are lower than the theoretical values. Both sets of values decrease linearly from 15 to 60 K and appear to remain at a constant value up to 70 K. Another aspect to emphasize is that while the experimental measurements indicate a lack of porosity from 60 K, and possibly between 50 and 60 K, the theoretical measurements seem to indicate the presence of a minimum value for porosity, which is in agreement with the experimental results obtained via other methods (Schulze & Abe 1980).…”
Section: Comparison Of Emas and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Also in Loeffler et al (2016), for 30 and 70 K, some experiments without thermal shield are carried out. Porosity calculated at 30 K is higher than that with thermal shield, but they do not reach the values derived from Satorre et al (2018). At 70 K they are indistinguishable with or without thermal shield, and for this reason they are not present in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Emas and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations