2012
DOI: 10.5849/sjaf.10-050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density of Gopher Tortoise Burrows on Commercial Forestland in Alabama and Mississippi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Wigley et al (), burrow density and size generally did not differ among stand structural classes, albeit all stands were due for a thinning or clearcut, on nearly 14,000 ha of closed‐canopy loblolly ( P. taeda ) and slash pine ( P. elliottii ) PPFs in Alabama and Mississippi. However, burrow densities suggested tortoise densities were lower than the threshold considered to constitute viable populations (Gopher Tortoise Council , ), which may be attributable to the intensive, historical silvicultural practices used in the surveyed stands and high canopy closure maintained over time.…”
Section: Tortoise Response To Timber Managementmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Wigley et al (), burrow density and size generally did not differ among stand structural classes, albeit all stands were due for a thinning or clearcut, on nearly 14,000 ha of closed‐canopy loblolly ( P. taeda ) and slash pine ( P. elliottii ) PPFs in Alabama and Mississippi. However, burrow densities suggested tortoise densities were lower than the threshold considered to constitute viable populations (Gopher Tortoise Council , ), which may be attributable to the intensive, historical silvicultural practices used in the surveyed stands and high canopy closure maintained over time.…”
Section: Tortoise Response To Timber Managementmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Tortoise use of PPFs may be greatest in clearcuts and regenerating (1–5 yr) stands and open areas adjacent to PPF stands (e.g., rights‐of‐way, roadsides) because these locations typically have open canopies (50–70% closure with some open patches), low to moderate basal area (<16.1 m 2 /ha), and abundant forages (Berish and Moore , Wilson et al , Baskaran et al , Berish et al , Greene et al ). Although tortoises do use PPF stands at canopy closure (Wigley et al ), studies have observed tortoises using edges of PPF stands and roadsides when stand interiors have closed canopies and then moving back to stand interiors following clearcut or another action that opens the canopy, such as thinning (Berish and Moore , Lamb et al ). No studies have reported adverse effects from clearcutting or other intensive forest management, although few have focused on PPFs.…”
Section: Tortoise Response To Timber Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations