1989
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.40.2477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density matrix for polarization of high-spin particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Background from production of Z + g(→ bb) will necessarily be present but will not produce a CP-violation effect. The analysis is similar to that for bW + → th, with the Z polarization vector replacing the top spin direction, and in practice the Z polarization is analyzed by its decay into l + l − or into qq [18]. For qq → Zh at FNAL, the initial q andq carry approximately equal fractions of the beam momentum so that it is necessary to use observables independent of the directions of the incoming momenta as written in Table 1.…”
Section: Qq → Zhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background from production of Z + g(→ bb) will necessarily be present but will not produce a CP-violation effect. The analysis is similar to that for bW + → th, with the Z polarization vector replacing the top spin direction, and in practice the Z polarization is analyzed by its decay into l + l − or into qq [18]. For qq → Zh at FNAL, the initial q andq carry approximately equal fractions of the beam momentum so that it is necessary to use observables independent of the directions of the incoming momenta as written in Table 1.…”
Section: Qq → Zhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the earlier work the angular correlation for the decay chain B → K 1 J/ψ, K 1 → Kρ and J/ψ → l + l − can be derived as well either in the helicity or the transversity basis. Since the matrix elements of the two decay processes B → K * J/ψ and B → K 1 J/ψ have the same Lorentz covariant form, although the invariant form factors can be different in size and CP properties, it is more convenient to apply the method of covariant density matrices [11] instead. Then it is quite simple to incorporate the fact that the two subsequent decays K * → Kπ and K 1 → Kρ produce different contributions in the decay density matrix of the J/ψ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the ensemble averaged value ǫ µ (q)ǫ * ν (q) can be replaced by the covariant density matrix ρ µν of the J/ψ which is obtained explicitly from the B decay process into the J/ψ. The most general form of ρ µν can be written as [11] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the heavy quark limit, the matrix element of current J can be parameterized by one or two scalar functions of y. Those scalar functions are called Isgur-Wise functions [19] and can be defined as…”
Section: B Three-point Sum Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%