Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3099564.3099565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density maps for improved SPH boundary handling

Abstract: Breaking dam scenario with 45 dynamic rigid bodies interacting with 710k fluid particles. Right: Three water wheels driven by 790k fluid particles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Particle sampled boundaries usually cause an undesired numerical dissipation of the kinetic energy in regions where the fluid is in contact with the boundary. Therefore, we would like to extend the approach for implicit boundary handling proposed by Koschier and Bender [66] in order to incorporate it into our solver for micropolar fluids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle sampled boundaries usually cause an undesired numerical dissipation of the kinetic energy in regions where the fluid is in contact with the boundary. Therefore, we would like to extend the approach for implicit boundary handling proposed by Koschier and Bender [66] in order to incorporate it into our solver for micropolar fluids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without solving the particle deficiency problem, numerical artifacts can arise near the solid boundaries. Koschier and Bender [KB17] proposed to extend the fluid's density field into the boundary geometry and discretize the function using cubic polynomials on a sparse grid without any dependence on particle sampling. To further improve the performance, Bender et al [BKWK19] suggested not to precompute the density field on the grid, but instead determine the intersection volume between a particle's support domain and the boundary on a coarse grid.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, treating solid wall boundaries still remains one of the most challenging parts in SPH. Over the past three decades, a variety of different strategies (e.g., ghost particles [AIA * 12], density maps [KB17], semi-analytical boundaries [FLR * 13], etc) have been developed for implementing solid walls in SPH , each with its advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their algorithm is intricate and computationally complex. More recently, Koschier and Bender [39] couples solids and fluids, where they use pre-processed density maps to handle non-penetration constraints. Although, this method robustly handles rigid dynamic boundaries, it can not handle deformable bodies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%