The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.58.4541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional approximations for confined classical fluids

Abstract: A density functional approximation, which is based on both the density functional Taylor series expansion of the one-particle direct correlation function and the exact contact value theorem for a hard wall, has been proposed to study the structural properties of confined classical fluids. The approximation has been applied to calculate the density profiles of sticky hard-sphere fluids confined in structureless hard walls. The calculated density profiles have shown that the present approximation compares very w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 For the high temperature, the present formally exact second-order perturbative DFT shows a good agreement with the simulation data; the present predictions are even better than that of a previous weighted density approximation (WDA) + functional perturbative expansion approximation (FPEA) DFT, 9 which divided the interaction potential into a short-ranged hard-spherelike part and a long-ranged interaction part and treated the former by the computationally intensive WDA and the latter by the third-order FPEA, even if we did not display their results in the present figure for clarity. It is well-known that the previous WDA + FPEA + DFT is better than the modified version of the Lovett-Mou-Buff-Wertheim (LMBW-1) 14 for the predictions of the density distribution profile.…”
Section: Formally Exact Second-order Perturbation Density Functiosupporting
confidence: 79%
“…14 For the high temperature, the present formally exact second-order perturbative DFT shows a good agreement with the simulation data; the present predictions are even better than that of a previous weighted density approximation (WDA) + functional perturbative expansion approximation (FPEA) DFT, 9 which divided the interaction potential into a short-ranged hard-spherelike part and a long-ranged interaction part and treated the former by the computationally intensive WDA and the latter by the third-order FPEA, even if we did not display their results in the present figure for clarity. It is well-known that the previous WDA + FPEA + DFT is better than the modified version of the Lovett-Mou-Buff-Wertheim (LMBW-1) 14 for the predictions of the density distribution profile.…”
Section: Formally Exact Second-order Perturbation Density Functiosupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The agreement is very good with the most significant improvement over previous theories such as the singlet PY results [40,41] or the DFT by Choudhury and Ghosh [30] occurring in the density profiles close to contact with the wall. This reflects the property that the FMT complies with the contact theorem [42], while other DFTs need an adjustable parameter to obtain the correct contact value [32,33]. The results for the solvation force between two planar plates are also significantly better than the ones obtained with previous theories [33,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The quality of the FMT results is clearly superior to the results obtained from the OZ equation based PY singlet approximation [40,41] or the DFT by Choudhury and Ghosh [30], both of which deviate significantly from simulations especially close to contact with the wall. Higher order DFTs [31][32][33] require a fitting parameter in order to match the correct contact value or equation of state. In contrast, the fact that the FMT respects the contact theorem [42], i.e.…”
Section: Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and n α are the weighted densities (or fundamental measures). For the attraction term, some non-mean-field methods including the weighted density approximation [35][36][37] and quadratic density expansion 38,39 have been shown to be more accurate for simple fluids and have been successfully applied to several inhomogeneous systems such as square-well fluids, 40 Lennard-Jones fluids, 41 Yukawa potentials, 42,43 and Sutherland fluids. 44 However, these methods have not yet been extended to the polymer brush system.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%