1995
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(94)01504-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional and post Hartree-Fock equilibrium geometries, potential energy surface and vibrational frequencies for methylamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the B3LYP imaginary frequencies differ no more than 80 cm -1 from the CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ results. All geometric parameters calculated using B3LYP/cc-pVQZ are, in general, in good agreement with the CCSD(T) results and also with previous theoretical calculations [7][8][9][10]13,14 and experimental data. [2][3][4] We have also carried out the IRC calculations using the B3LYP/ cc-pVTZ method and the results confirm that the first-order inversion transition state and the rotation transition state connect to the ground state, as already shown by Kim and Zeroka 13 using a more complete two-dimensional potential energy surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the B3LYP imaginary frequencies differ no more than 80 cm -1 from the CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ results. All geometric parameters calculated using B3LYP/cc-pVQZ are, in general, in good agreement with the CCSD(T) results and also with previous theoretical calculations [7][8][9][10]13,14 and experimental data. [2][3][4] We have also carried out the IRC calculations using the B3LYP/ cc-pVTZ method and the results confirm that the first-order inversion transition state and the rotation transition state connect to the ground state, as already shown by Kim and Zeroka 13 using a more complete two-dimensional potential energy surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…112.4 A (1,4,11) 110.3 A (1,4,12); A (1,4,13) 112.4 A (1,2,5) 110.1 A (1,3,10); A (1,3,9) 112.8 A (1,3,8 1.093 R (2,6) (2,7)…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are several reported experimental inversion barriers ranging from 20.19 to 24.89 kJ/mol 9–11. Calculated rotation barriers reported in the literature range from 8.10 to 9.81kJ/mol 12–14. Calculated second‐order inversion barriers in the literature range from 20.30 to 24 kJ/mol 12–15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%