2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.035415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density functional analysis of key energetics in metal homoepitaxy: Quantum size effects in periodic slab calculations

Abstract: Adspecies terrace diffusion barriers, pair interaction energies, and formation energies control island nucleation and growth during deposition and postdeposition coarsening in metal homoepitaxial systems. Thus, accurate theoretical determination of such energies is key for predicting behavior or for interpreting experiments. Often energies are obtained from density-functional theory using slab geometries. However, we find surprisingly strong variation in these energies with slab thickness due to quantum size e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(70 reference statements)
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The number in the bracket reflects variation with the slab thickness, for example, from L = 3 to 5, that results in uncertainties in the last significant digit of the quoted energetics. 8 ) This is significantly lower than μ S for most of the structures in Figure 2 or 3. In this family, the lowest value of μ S (−1.77 eV) is found for the Cu 9 S 12 structure, in which each S adatom is coordinated to two Cu adatoms.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(The number in the bracket reflects variation with the slab thickness, for example, from L = 3 to 5, that results in uncertainties in the last significant digit of the quoted energetics. 8 ) This is significantly lower than μ S for most of the structures in Figure 2 or 3. In this family, the lowest value of μ S (−1.77 eV) is found for the Cu 9 S 12 structure, in which each S adatom is coordinated to two Cu adatoms.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The digit in parentheses reflects variations with the slab thickness. 8 For instance, a value of −1.772(8) eV means the average value is −1.772 eV, and the slab-dependent variation is up to ±0.008 eV. In summary, we propose a new model for the √43 reconstruction of S on Cu(111) based on DFT and STM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The adsorption site for adatoms on fcc, hcp, and bcc metals is assumed to be fcc, hcp, and long bridge, respectively. Values are calculated using DFT-PBE, averaging results from 3 to 5 layer slabs, with 4 surface atoms on each side of the clean slab [124].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 From 0.004 < θ S < 0.05 ML, the hearts progressively coexist on terraces with complexes resembling concatenated hearts, clumps, and finally the √43 reconstruction. 37,[51][52] In addition, the preference for binding at step edges of Cu (111) is very high, and steps are extensively decorated and faceted along the closepacked directions in this small sulfur coverage range.…”
Section: Comparison To Cu(111) Under Identical Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energetics were averaged over slabs with thickness, L, from 7 to 12 Au layers. 52 We used k-point grids that approximately corresponded to (24×24×1) for the primitive substrate cell. All configurations reported herein were energy-optimized, with the bottom layer of Au atoms fixed.…”
Section: Computational Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%