2010
DOI: 10.1190/1.3462777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density extraction from P-wave AVO inversion: Tuscaloosa Trend example

Abstract: Density extraction from amplitude-variation-with-offset (AVO) inversion is thought to be unstable and difficult. Recent research has, however, shown that it is possible to reliably extract density from P-wave reflection data if the interface has significant contrast.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimation of the density through seismic inversion has been considered difficult and is dependent on the appropriate angle stacks to get a meaningful result. However some encouraging results have been reported for density estimation where density contrast is the dominant contributor for lithology or fluid discrimination (Behura et al, 2010, Kabir et al, 2006). An estimation of density through simultaneous inversion may be useful in this case if far angle volumes greater than 30 degrees are available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimation of the density through seismic inversion has been considered difficult and is dependent on the appropriate angle stacks to get a meaningful result. However some encouraging results have been reported for density estimation where density contrast is the dominant contributor for lithology or fluid discrimination (Behura et al, 2010, Kabir et al, 2006). An estimation of density through simultaneous inversion may be useful in this case if far angle volumes greater than 30 degrees are available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio are calculated indirectly from P wave, S wave, and density data and directly from pre-stack inversion. However, density data is difficult to be estimated and the results are usually unreliable (Downton, 2005;Behura et al, 2010). In addition, the above indirect calculation method may lead to accumulative error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, seismic reflection events at large offsets are often seriously distorted and need to be conditioned carefully due to normal moveout (NMO) stretching and tuning effects (Zhang et al 2012). For the very rare situations when density contrast is a dominant contributor to the reflection coefficient, density may be estimated from near and far offsets (Behura et al 2010). For the majority of cases, density inversion using field data is extremely ill-posed, as the data contain noise and the results will be unstable (Downton et al 2001;Downton and Lines 2004;Alemie and Sacchi 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%