2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00265.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density Effects on Plant Height Growth and Inequality in Sunflower Populations

Abstract: Comparisons between competing and non-competing sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) populations demonstrate pronounced effects of density on plant height growth, height-to-crown width ratio, and a population's height inequality. In the present study, non-destructive measurements of height and the projected crown area of sunflower plants were taken at seven times from emergence to fruit maturation in even-aged monospecific stands with initial densities of 1, 4, 16, and 64 plants/m 2 . The mean height of population… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum stem thickness and flower diameter were obtained for plants at a spacing of 50 cm, while the plant height reached its highest value at a plant spacing of 30 cm (Table 6). Accompanied by an increase in plant density, the maximum value of stem thickness and flower diameter decreased, while the maximum value of plant height increased, which was in agreement with the research of Xiao el al (2006) [25], who indicated that the average plant height increased with an increase in plant density (lower than 16 plants/m 2 ). However, there was no significant difference between the designed treatments on the maximum value of plant height, stem thickness, and head diameter.…”
Section: Plant Vegetative Indexessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The maximum stem thickness and flower diameter were obtained for plants at a spacing of 50 cm, while the plant height reached its highest value at a plant spacing of 30 cm (Table 6). Accompanied by an increase in plant density, the maximum value of stem thickness and flower diameter decreased, while the maximum value of plant height increased, which was in agreement with the research of Xiao el al (2006) [25], who indicated that the average plant height increased with an increase in plant density (lower than 16 plants/m 2 ). However, there was no significant difference between the designed treatments on the maximum value of plant height, stem thickness, and head diameter.…”
Section: Plant Vegetative Indexessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…1). The effect of facilitation was particularly evident under low to medium population densities, but was not observed at high densities: the lowest size inequality occurred at intermediate densities, not at the lowest densities, as observed in most studies on competition (such as Weiner & Thomas 1986;Weiner et al 2001;Xiao et al 2006). This pattern is consistent with our previous results , which suggest that positive interactions dominate population behaviour at low to medium densities, while competition dominates in high-density populations (see also Dickie et al 2005;Leslie 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The effect of facilitation was particularly evident under low to medium population densities, but was not observed at high densities: the lowest size inequality occurred at intermediate densities, not at the lowest densities, as observed in most studies on competition (such as Weiner & Thomas 1986; Weiner et al. 2001; Xiao et al. 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Adequate water not only benefits individual plant growth but also increases the density of the population. The productivity and available resources of ecosystems are limited, and a high population density intensifies competition for water, nutrients, and space among plants in a community ( Enquist et al, 1998 ; Xiao et al, 2006 ). In summary, transient fluctuations in precipitation levels can affect plant survival, thereby determining the density of plants and population expansion without affecting population structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%