1996
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density Effect on the Fruit-set, Seed Crop Viability and Seedling Vigour ofAbies pinsapo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
2
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
29
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the sub-humid areas produced substantially heavier cones with better seed fills in comparison to the lower semiarid zones. Other previous studies showed that stand density also affects the cone production per tree, reducing the production due to the higher tree densities within the stand (Ayari et al, 2010;2011a), that is associated with an increased tree competition (Arista and Talavera, 1996;Karlsson and Orlander, 2002). In the present study, stand density affected negatively the crown dimension of the average tree, especially CrS and CrV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…In our study, the sub-humid areas produced substantially heavier cones with better seed fills in comparison to the lower semiarid zones. Other previous studies showed that stand density also affects the cone production per tree, reducing the production due to the higher tree densities within the stand (Ayari et al, 2010;2011a), that is associated with an increased tree competition (Arista and Talavera, 1996;Karlsson and Orlander, 2002). In the present study, stand density affected negatively the crown dimension of the average tree, especially CrS and CrV.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Second, young trees in revegetated areas are unlikely to provide the large fruit crops that older trees in unmined forest can. Additionally, high tree stem densities -typically much higher in revegetation than in unmined forest -can limit tree growth rates (Stoneman et al 1997;Grigg and Grant 2009) and may also constrain flowering and fruit crops (Arista 1996;Williams et al 2006). Glossy black cockatoos (Calyptorhynchus lathami) preferentially feed in trees with large fruit crops, probably because it is more energy efficient (Chapman and Paton 2005); so, the same may hold true for our study species in the jarrah forest.…”
Section: Successional Changes In Feeding Activitymentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Two lines of evidence support this conclusion. Firstly, in wind-pollinated plants, the efficiency of wind pollination increases as density increases (Whitehead 1983;Allison 1990;Arista and Talavera 1996;Friedman and Barrett 2009). Density, however, depends on the spatial scale of measurement, and inter-plant distance is a more direct and meaningful measure to evaluate the effects of proximity (Harper 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%