Density, Distance, and Division: Rural Poverty in a Developing‐Country Context

Abstract

The 3Ds, namely, density, distance, and division, are important for regional economic development and are integrated into a “3D” analytical framework in the 2009 World Development Report. Few empirical studies have examined the relevance of the 3D framework for explaining rural poverty in a developing‐country context. The effects of density on poverty are seldom studied, and distances to different layers of city centers on poverty may vary across different contexts. This paper aims to fill these gaps. Examining the case of Guizhou Province in China and adopting methods of the ordinary least square, instrument variable, and spatial econometrics, we find the evidence of the 3D framework for explaining rural poverty at the county level. Population density has a negative effect on rural poverty, while division, as measured by share of the ethnic minority population, has a positive effect. The effects of distance are mixed. Distance to Guiyang, which is the provincial political‐economic center of Guizhou province, has a negative effect on rural poverty, whereas distance to the local city center has no effect. These results can provide important policy implications for local poverty‐alleviation.

Does industry convergence between agriculture and related sectors alleviate rural poverty: evidence from China

“…The empirical results show that the poverty reduction effects of each type of convergence are different in different periods and regions. When rural industry convergence is used as a rural development strategy, the government must fully consider the environment of industrial development, and the characteristics of regional resource endowments (Wang et al, 2018 ). Like the views of other scholars, policymakers need to take active measures to ensure rural economic growth that benefits the poor.…”

Rural spatial transformation and governance from the perspective of land development rights: A case study of Fenghe village in Guangzhou

“…The rural areas on the fringes of cities have relatively sufficient land resources, which provide land space for the renewal of urban capital (Wang et al., 2018). Moreover, there are many problems in rural areas, such as low efficiency of land output, unreasonable structure of land use, and fragmentation of land resources.…”

Systematic review and comparison of densification effects and planning motivations

“…Effects related to climate change are positive because of reduced GHG emissions, often related to reduced car mobility. However, despite the reduction per capita, the overall levels increase in more urban areas simply because more people live in those areas (Wang et al 2018;). Finally, carbon sequestration that could help to reduce the overall CO 2 levels was shown to be lowest in developed urban areas and highest in rural areas (Li et al 2016).…”