Density and viscosity of three (2,2,2-trifluoroethanol + 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium) ionic liquid binary systems

Self-diffusion, velocity cross-correlation, distinct diffusion and resistance coefficients of the ionic liquid [BMIM][Tf2N] at high pressure

“…c δ (=B/T0) is the Angell strength factor; a lower δ indicates a more fragile liquid.rotating cylinder results and those below 253 K have been omitted from the fit. Overall, there is good agreement with the rotating cylinder viscometer results of Salgado et al52 and of Hiraga et al,54 the oscillating piston results of Atilhan et al51 and the falling ball results of Salinas et al58 The capillary viscometer results of Pan et al,48 the rotating cylinder results of Tariq et al,55 and the cone and plate viscosities of Vranes et al 50 trend lower at lower temperatures. For [HMIM][Tf 2 N], our data lie slightly below the correlation from the 2009 IUPAC sponsored round-robin study 49 of a specific sample of [HMIM][Tf 2 N] at lower temperatures and slightly above at high temperatures.…”

Densities at Pressures up to 200 MPa and Atmospheric Pressure Viscosities of Ionic Liquids 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Methylphosphate, 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Diethylphosphate, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Acetate, and 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide

“…In Figure 1, relative deviations from Harris et al, 31 de Azevedo et al, 18 de Castro et al, 20 Troncoso et al, 32 and Salgado et al 33 were within the experimental uncertainty of this work. The deviations of Jacquemin et al 19 Figure S8, the deviation of [bmim][Ac] from Almeida et al 35 was higher than the uncertainties of this work, and the deviations were positive.…”

“…From Figure 2, the relative deviations from Harris et al 31 and Tariq et al 42 were within the uncertainty of this work when the uncertainties, 2 %, of their works were considered. The deviation from Salgado et al 33 [Ac] could be estimated because the purity of that work was lower than the purity in this work, and the deviations from Almeida et al 35 and Xu et al 46 for the same IL should be caused by higher water concentration than in this work. When the effect of 1 % of a fictitious impurity having a viscosity of η 2 (= η 1 /10) mPa·s is considered, much of the literature viscosity data would be in the range of the viscosities reported in this work ( (Tables 6 to 9).…”

Excess molar volumes and viscosity behaviour of binary mixtures of aniline/or N,N-dimethylaniline with imidazolium ionic liquids having triflate or bistriflamide anion

“…[60];( )McHale et al [61]; () Arce et al [34];(d) [bmim][NTf2] -( )Hiraga et al [62]; ( )Kanakubo et al [63]; ( ) de Castro et al [64]; ( ) Jacquemin et al [65]; ( ) Widowati et al [66]; ( ) Currás et al [67]; ( ) Azevedo et al [68]; (⌧) Hamidova et al [69]; ( ) Tariq et al [70]; ( ) Jacquemin et al [71]; ( ) Montalbán et al [52]; ( ) Zhang et al [72]; ( ) Tariq et al [73]; () Seoane et al [74]; ( ) Harris et al [75]; ( ) Atilhan et al [76]; ( ) Salgado et al [77]; ( )Vraneš et al [35]. [43]; ( ) MacNeil et al [45]; ( ) Tsierkezos et al [30] [79]; ( )Harris et al [75]; ( )Atilhan et al [76]; ( ) Salgadoet al [77]; ( )Vraneš et al [35].…”