1939
DOI: 10.1177/00220345390180030301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density and Refractive Index Studies of Dental Hard Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was necessary because most of the studies evaluated the enamel loss in thickness. The value of 3.0 g/cm 4 for enamel density was used (MANLY et al, 1939). Mass loss in each stage was divided by the density value to obtain the corresponding enamel volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was necessary because most of the studies evaluated the enamel loss in thickness. The value of 3.0 g/cm 4 for enamel density was used (MANLY et al, 1939). Mass loss in each stage was divided by the density value to obtain the corresponding enamel volume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depth of etch was calculated from the following equation: Depth of etch = mass/(density E biopsy area) (density of enamel = 2.95 gcm -3 ; density of cementum = 2.03 gcm -3 ) [Manly et al, 1939].…”
Section: Fluoride Uptake By Enamel and Cementummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following equations were used to calculate the acid-etched depth and the fluoride content of each layer sampled from the enamel specimens. The calculations used a density of 2.95 g ⁄ cm 3 for enamel 16 and a 37.5% calcium concentration of the enamel. Since the exact density of partially demineralized enamel is not known, the two parameters calculated are approximations: (1) acid-etched depth (lm) = mass of calcium (lg) ⁄ [37.5% · 2.95 (g ⁄ cm …”
Section: Measuring the Fluoride Content Of Remineralized Enamelmentioning
confidence: 99%