Density and Diversity Differences of Contemporary and Subfossil Cladocera Assemblages: A Case Study in an Oxbow Lake

Abstract

Cladocerans are biological indicators of environmental changes. Their remains provide information on past changes in lake environments. We studied the correspondence between contemporary Cladocera assemblages and their subfossil remains from an oxbow lake. We sought to demonstrate that there were differences among the various sites of an oxbow lake with different utilization based on contemporary and subfossil Cladocera assemblages and physical–chemical variables. The oxbow lake’s two sides are used as fishing sites, where angling is the main activity. The middle site of the lake is under nature protection with high macrovegetation coverage. Contemporary and subfossil Cladocera assemblages were sampled from 21 sampling sites along the oxbow lake. Our research showed that the subfossil Cladocera assemblages had higher species richness and densities (36 taxa) than the contemporary species (29 taxa). We found one species of the Polyphemidae family only in the contemporary assemblage. Among the sites, Cladocera assemblages differed in their species composition and density. The highest densities were found in the second fishing site due to the appearance of the small-sized Bosmids. The relationship between Cladocerans and the physical–chemical variables showed that some variables, such as chlorophyll-a, biological oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen, copper, phosphide, and organic matter content, significantly affected Cladocera composition. We found that the subfossil Cladocera assemblage was significantly more diverse and abundant than the contemporary one, indicating that an integrated sampling may be sufficient to provide better results on the total species composition of the water body.

The Effects of Intraguild Predation on Phytoplankton Assemblage Composition and Diversity: A Mesocosm Experiment

“…Top-down control by predators can shift the size distribution of zooplankton communities to smaller species, which exhibit relatively less feeding pressure on phytoplankton, thereby increasing the likelihood of phytoplankton blooms [ 7 ]. Meanwhile, small zooplankton had higher prey selectivity than large zooplankton [ 8 ], which will have an impact on the assemblage composition and diversity of phytoplankton [ 9 , 10 ]. Alternatively, IGP-induced changes in the composition of the zooplankton community can also strongly affect the composition and diversity of phytoplankton assemblage through trophic cascade and nutrient uptake, known as “bottom-up effects” [ 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”