2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2020.138931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Densification, microstructure and mechanical properties of an Al-14.1Mg-0.47Si-0.31Sc-0.17Zr alloy printed by selective laser melting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies on alloys with Mg/Zn have indicated that a moderate volumetric energy input (∼100 J mm −3 ) is ideal for the formation of >99% dense parts [45,77,78,80,81,89]. At energy inputs that are too low (∼<50 J mm −3 ), lack of fusion pores dominate; at energy inputs that are too high (∼>150 J mm −3 ), vaporisation of Zn/Mg increases the likelihood of keyhole pore formation [73,80,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96]. The present authors reiterate that the volumetric energy density model is too simplistic to capture the true physical processes occurring during AM processing and these specific values are rather arbitrary, especially when comparing between studies in which different build layer thicknesses are used [10]; however, it allows for useful, albeit less rigorous, comparison between differing studies and AM equipment on simple build geometries.…”
Section: Vaporisation Of Solute Elements and Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on alloys with Mg/Zn have indicated that a moderate volumetric energy input (∼100 J mm −3 ) is ideal for the formation of >99% dense parts [45,77,78,80,81,89]. At energy inputs that are too low (∼<50 J mm −3 ), lack of fusion pores dominate; at energy inputs that are too high (∼>150 J mm −3 ), vaporisation of Zn/Mg increases the likelihood of keyhole pore formation [73,80,[89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96]. The present authors reiterate that the volumetric energy density model is too simplistic to capture the true physical processes occurring during AM processing and these specific values are rather arbitrary, especially when comparing between studies in which different build layer thicknesses are used [10]; however, it allows for useful, albeit less rigorous, comparison between differing studies and AM equipment on simple build geometries.…”
Section: Vaporisation Of Solute Elements and Porositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since much of the energy is reflected or conducted away from the melt pool region, processing of these materials requires a very high beam energy to achieve a proper melt. The feasibility of fabricating Al alloys using laser powder bed fusion AM has been studied by many researchers [265][266][267][268][269][270][271][272][273][274][275][276][277][278][279][280][281][282][283][284]. Most of the research in the literature has been focused on optimizing the process to achieve quality parts.…”
Section: Laser-processed Al Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all; PBF, BJ, MJ, and DED currently use spherical metal powders as a feedstock to obtain metallic components. For PBF processes [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8], the powder homogeneity is important since a smooth layer may provide decent properties. Homogeneity on the powder bed layer depends on powder properties such as size, cohesion, impurities, apparent/tapped density, moisture, shape, roughness, etc [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%