2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60796-8_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dense Subgraphs Summarization: An Efficient Way to Summarize Large Scale Graphs by Super Nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike other compression methods [11], the DSS method [16] is not designed to optimise the size of the summary. Thus it is, generally speaking, not the most efficient in terms of compression rates.…”
Section: Dense Subgraph Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike other compression methods [11], the DSS method [16] is not designed to optimise the size of the summary. Thus it is, generally speaking, not the most efficient in terms of compression rates.…”
Section: Dense Subgraph Summarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property can be measured by the concept of visibility introduced in [15] and defined in Section 3. In [16], the authors propose the Dense Subgraph Summarization method (DSS), a lossless compression scheme which addresses this issue, allowing a direct access to the dense subgraphs in the summary. However, this method requires the computation of some dense components of the Graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study of dense subgraphs has been of high interest in research community for many decades. There have been numerous works on graphlet mining [19,54,63], on complete dense subgraphs such as maximal cliques [13, 18, 23-26, 29, 46, 53, 69], maximal bicliques [3,43,52], and graph summarization based on maximal cliques and quasi-cliques [76]. There exist many different types of degree-based incomplete dense subgraphs other than the quasi-clique, such as k-core [9,17,27,38], k-truss [20], and k-plex [10,21,22].…”
Section: Other Work On Dense Subgraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%