Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.2172/1369162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dense Plasma Focus Modeling

Abstract: strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher's right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness. position in both of these DPF. At the optimum distance, one main pulse, preceded by a small 'front porch' pulse is formed, and the neutron yield is predicted to be twice that of the current yield. • The energy distribution of the neutron produced provides a stringent test of the fidelity and predictive capabili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dense Plasma Focus has been a subject of MHD and kinetic modelling studies for quite a long time [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] which have been reviewed comprehensively [3]. One feature of modern computational models [28,29] of the Dense Plasma Focus is that they give better agreement with experiments if the values of circuit inductance and resistance are suitably chosen to be different from measured values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dense Plasma Focus has been a subject of MHD and kinetic modelling studies for quite a long time [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] which have been reviewed comprehensively [3]. One feature of modern computational models [28,29] of the Dense Plasma Focus is that they give better agreement with experiments if the values of circuit inductance and resistance are suitably chosen to be different from measured values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%